In the process of cleaning house, why delete the innocent question about these Monotrons's call signs?
It's fine. I'll survive until next month when I just ask a monorail CM.
Anyway...
Having it glow would have been cool. LED's on the side or something. That would have been a lot of work though since there isn't much of a system to tap into for that.
Which side do you guys prefer? I think I'm going with the right side with the yellow.
Spent this afternoon at EPCOT. There were at least 3 trains on the EPCOT line: black, blue, and gold. No TRONorail.
I can sort of see your argument, but it is misguided. The monorails are not near the end. If the oldest ones life expectancy is another 4 years, then that is lot of time to keep using it. With my car, I take excellent care of it, service it often, and it saves me money. It is now 7 years old with 100k miles and it runs like a dream. Should I go out and buy a new one just for the sake of getting one? If I am still driving this car in another 7 years and things are breaking that are more expensive then the car itself is worth to fix, then I will buy a new one of course. The monorails however, are not at that point.
When your car starts dying. Do you keep running it? Taking it to the repair shop ever few weeks? Pulling it out of service every so often for repairs, and then when it is dead and beyond all repair buy a new one?
Or, when it starts getting old, but before it starts to have real problems, do you buy a new one ?
-dave
But that's the thing, the monorails shouldn't feel like some crummy city bus that's plastered with advertisments. They (like everything else in WDW) shouldn't remind you of the real world and should feel clean and futuristic.
That might be related to mentality differences but I like to squeeze every last drop out of something, or until it is still feasible to do so.
If we're talking about disc brakes on an aircraft, then they should be replaced before they are completely worn out. But a car which burns fuel inefficiently, maybe leaks some oil, and has some rust holes in the tail pipe causing noise does not necessarily require replacement of the entire vehicle.
When things start to get out of hand such as having to change the transmission or having to buy a $2500 engine for a car that is worth less than that, then purchasing a new vehicle is a good option.
Surely whatever company which made whatever parts for the trains expects to have some sort of demand for the parts after they stop making them, if they haven't already. While different designs and improvements should be looked at, the trains should not be replaced until sometime after their life expectancy.
The average human life expectancy in the US is about 78. Does that mean that once someone turns 78 that they should be tossed to the side even though they may suffer form diabetes and arthritis?
If one buys a gallon of milk today, which expires on April 7, would they throw away the unused milk, if any, on April 6? I would drink it until April 7 and even a day after if there is some left considering there has to be some factor of safety included in the actual life span of the milk, rather than the advertised life span.
As if buses, cars and even elevated trains are not something we see everyday. I see billboards on most days too driving on I-78 or I-95. I also see them on World Drive when I'm in WDW. It doesn't bother me at all that things from the "outside world" also appear in the "Disney World".
I really like the Tronorail, I think it resembles the light cycles in a tasteful way. Hey, it's only temporary, anyway.
CBA. What is the cost of the fuel loss as compared to the cost of a new car over the lifespan of each. What is the depreciation cost, what is the cost of capital, what are the tax incentives. I threw the car out there as a simple example, but in the matter of expensive, specialized equipement it's a different story. I used to do some cost benefit analysis on the replacement of heavy construction equipment. There are MANY factors to take into account. What it all boils down to is you convert the cost of EVERYTHING to dollars and then make an appropriate decision tree. It is not a simple overnight process, and quite frankly is something that should be done as a matter of course on a scheduled basis, not just when something begins to age into it's lifespan.
Phonedave said:Silly, silly examples don't help to make a point.
Comparing the process that is involved in making a decision to replace or maintain a multi-million dollar, unique, transportation asset that has significant maintence costs to the decision to pitch a gallon of milk is just absurd.
-dave
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.