Having just visited Universal myself for the first time a few weeks ago, l'd like to add my opinion on this.
First off, yes, Harry Potter is probably the best part of Universal. It has that "Disney" vibe: the theming, rides, shops, food, etc. all fit in really well. Even the cast in the area do a good job of playing the role. The attention to detail lets you really immerse yourself in the action going on, something of which Disney has excelled at for years. However, outside of this and possibly the Simpsons area, this immersion appears to be severely lacking in the park. Sure, you may have some themed lands, but there's not near enough detail to make you think you've escaped reality and entered a fantasy land.
Personally, I think part of the problem is that there is no centrally - recognized character or mascot that one thinks of when they think of "Universal," so it's hard to incorporate that immersive theming throughout the park. Disney has Mickey, Six Flags has Bugs Bunny, Universal has...? There's several mascots (Harry, Minions, Dr. Seuss) that Universal could use, but it just seems like they're all over the place on coming up with a central "theme" or quite frankly don't wish to have a common theme.
As far as rides are concerned, Universal has way more "E-ticket" / thrill ride density than Disney. Not as much "family friendly", but they don't appear to be targeted to family as much either. Universal's rides are also more up-to-date...but that is also a consequence of what they choose to exhibit at their park.
So who wins? Depends on how you look at it. For the level of action, Universal wins. However, for that full immersion feeling, Disney is a generation ahead of Universal.
First off, yes, Harry Potter is probably the best part of Universal. It has that "Disney" vibe: the theming, rides, shops, food, etc. all fit in really well. Even the cast in the area do a good job of playing the role. The attention to detail lets you really immerse yourself in the action going on, something of which Disney has excelled at for years. However, outside of this and possibly the Simpsons area, this immersion appears to be severely lacking in the park. Sure, you may have some themed lands, but there's not near enough detail to make you think you've escaped reality and entered a fantasy land.
Personally, I think part of the problem is that there is no centrally - recognized character or mascot that one thinks of when they think of "Universal," so it's hard to incorporate that immersive theming throughout the park. Disney has Mickey, Six Flags has Bugs Bunny, Universal has...? There's several mascots (Harry, Minions, Dr. Seuss) that Universal could use, but it just seems like they're all over the place on coming up with a central "theme" or quite frankly don't wish to have a common theme.
As far as rides are concerned, Universal has way more "E-ticket" / thrill ride density than Disney. Not as much "family friendly", but they don't appear to be targeted to family as much either. Universal's rides are also more up-to-date...but that is also a consequence of what they choose to exhibit at their park.
So who wins? Depends on how you look at it. For the level of action, Universal wins. However, for that full immersion feeling, Disney is a generation ahead of Universal.