Buried20KLeague
Well-Known Member
I am sure I missed this somewhere in the discussion, but does the system "force" you to take three FP+s? If you only wanted the FP+ for, say, Test Track, is it going to automatically throw you FP+s for Maelstrom and Living with the Land? If so, it seems like everyone skipping those meaningless reservations for attractions with short lines might force WDW to quickly tweak their system--or at least recognize there is a problem. If no one is showing up where and when Disney expects them, their big-bucks system won't be serving its purpose. (And let's be clear there, the purpose isn't "improving guest experience" but rather "collecting data and using it to manipulate crowds/cut costs.")
My opinion on this is to consider Pavlov's Dog. When the bell rings, the dog salivates because it knows its getting a treat.
I venture to say that even if it's not required, a high percentage of people will use that FP (even on attractions where it doesn't really gain you much/anything) just because it's a "perk". The "bell" will ring, and the guest will "react".
And either way, I'm not sure it would matter. If there's excess capacity at a lower tier attraction, I'm not sure TDO cares if it's because standby or FP specifically aren't showing up. I'd imagine their goal is just to ensure everyone is divvied out their three for the day, so they can fulfill their obligation.
They'll pay close attention to the the headliners, to be sure. But the low tier attractions don't need FP, and they know it. There's proof of that. They're just using those low tiers as FP fillers.