JML42691
Active Member
Which one?:lookaroun :lol:Because of all the controversy caused by the hand and wand I hear Imagineers are down sizing it to just one finger
Which one?:lookaroun :lol:Because of all the controversy caused by the hand and wand I hear Imagineers are down sizing it to just one finger
Which one?:lookaroun :lol:
SSE was perfect without the dockside crane and facade next to it. It didn`t need anything else - now it`s detracted and distracting.
Mr. Sklar left the office some months ago...
.
:lol:
Dockside crane?
This has been done many times in the past already...We don't need another one.
I didn't see this thought posted, but I didn't read all twelve pages of this thread... I digress...
IMO Disney is notorious for reusing artwork, themes, characters in many different ways... when/if the wand comes down, why not remove the EPCOT branch and place the wand over at MGM with the Sorcerer's hat...
Just a random thought...
Oh, another one?? I was thinking about doing this myself, but why not start a poll thread about the wand.... maybe then everyone will know once and for all what the fans think about wand... put it to a vote...
Make mine a no!
it would make a lot of people happy to see a 5th Theme Park, too, but that won't change the fact that it won't happen. It's right up there with that monorail expansion they I'm SURE will break ground next week...It likely has not stopped people from going there, but it sure does seem it would make a lot of people happy to see it gone...
Arnold Schwartzenegger: "It is not a tumor!"If you have a growth on your face that is just cosmetic, why not just leave it there? It's not hurting anything and it won't cost you money.
No, it's ugly, and if your face improves by removing, then you do it.
If you have a growth on your face that is just cosmetic, why not just leave it there? It's not hurting anything and it won't cost you money.
No, it's ugly, and if your face improves by removing, then you do it.
To the Wand haters:
We understand you don't like the Wand. But can you really justify spending the money to remove it? Has the wand stopped anyone from visiting? Have you heard any guest state: "I'm not going in there!! Look at that ugly old wand"? Has the presence of the wand forced any guests out of Epcot? Has the wand really ever ruined your vacation?
My answer to all questions would be: NO.
Of course the wand has not driven people away from the park. But Imagineering used to be about making the right changes regardless of whether they could be quantified or justified financially. I rarely ever invoke the name of Walt (because it is done far too often), but we all know that if he saw something so blatanly out of step with a park's vision, he'd do what he could to change it no matter the cost. A second gate at WDW didn't need to cost $1.2 billion, but the Imagineers went the extra mile (and dollar) to do what they felt needed to be done to really complete EPCOT Center. Hell, Disneyland in CA didn't need to exist in the first place--but a huge financial risk was taken to create something special, and to do it right. I'm not suggesting that WDI should be reckless with money, but were it run today the way it used to be (and not as a division whose biggest priority is the mighty dollar uber alis), I find it hard to believe they wouldn't spend the money to take down a "temporary" decoration after 8 years.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.