Laufschneller65 said:
I agree. As much of a ____*t he was, he was always president Clinton to me. But I guess it just goes to show the difference in morals and class between a mojority of the people in the two parties that republicans may dislike a leader yet they still show respect. I mean, why is it the smartest people are republicans and the middle people are split in half, and the poorest welfare suckers are democrats. Maybe because the democrats arn't for what's right but are more for how can we get more votes, (hence fighting for """ILLEAGAL ALIENS TO VOTE""" they dont care about economy or the money making american. sry to say this but If you make money and pay your taxes like a good citizen, the democrats consider you rich. sry but all union workers are rich in the democrats eyes and they don't care about you.
My God. That might be the most ignorant thing I've ever read on these boards, You're giving EQ11 a run for her money.
First of all, I like how you split your logic in 'twain...
The SMARTEST people are Republicans...
The MIDDLE PEOPLE are split in half...
And the POOREST welfare suckers are Democrats?
I like how you go from talking about intelligence, to income, in the span of one sentence
So does that mean only rich people are smart? And if you're poor, you must therefore be dumb, and certianly not Republican? All those "Blue collar" hourly-wage earners in the red states have buried treasure no one knows about? Or at least, they were too "smart" to bother voting? Because Bucko, I went to a private school on an academic scholarship plus grants and loans. Some of the dumbest, cruelest, Roofie-usingest, barely-graduatingest dullards I ever met came from money. And having had a scholarship, I must not have been the dullest bulb in the bin. And now...well, let's just say I wouldn't be terribly surprised if I made more money than you do, and I'm a liberal. And I'm awesome.
Second of alll, between Monicagate & Kosovo, rightwing talk show hosts were calling for Clinton to be impeached if not imprisoned on a fairly regular basis, most notably Sean Hannity & Limbaugh. They were trying to wrest executive powers away from Slick Willie, and a regime change later fully endorse the inherent, unitary executive power under which Bush reigns, putting the hippo in hypocrite. They had no respect for the office when Clinton occupied the big chair, so don't assume otherwise.
And finally, because I think it bears repeating, nobody made a comment about Bush's politics. Nobody mentioned Iraq, gas prices, 9/11, terrorism, Hezbollah, social security insolvency, no minimum wage increase, real incomes going down, ignoring global warming, endorsing abstinence-only s e x education that has a proves history of being ineffective, employment rates that are jiggered to look better because many people are now ineligible to receive unemployment benefits anymore, because it's been too long since they've worked (as opposed to the TRUE number of unemployed people)...nobody mentioned any of that. Someone mentioned Bush used the s-word on live TV...because (and bear with me now, it's kind of important)...BUSH USED THE S-WORD ON LIVE TV!!! It was a simple Hall Of President-related joke, but because Saint Dubya was maligned in your eyes, you think it MUST be political. It's not. End of story. I assure you, if they had a Hall of Representatives attraction, I'd ask that a Cynthia MacKinney AA be shown slapping a security guard, because politics aside, that's what she did, so feel free to put that in the suggestion box on your way home to nurse your wounds.
Folks, I will do my darnedest to not bring up politics again, I only did so because Silly Mc StupidTHoughts made some asinine comments that I couldn't let stand. There's a difference between political humor and topical humor, and I guess some "Smart" Republicans can't tell the difference. More 'tis the pity. For all of us.