Cesar R M
Well-Known Member
My opinion is law!
My opinion is law!
Not at all, because Marvel is printing money. So adding Marvel in the cheapest way (overlay) will get them more "gate" hits.Wouldn't the "cheap out" solution have been to just leave Tower as it was? If you think this is cheap, that would have been literally free.
I actually think the building looks pretty cool. I wouldn't want it in DHS because I love the look and feel of Hollywood Boulevard, but I have no great love for the DCA "theming" overall so this doesn't bother me in the slightest.
Doesnt change the fact that it LOOKS HIDEOUS and doesn't fit the view AT ALL.I love how as soon as one person (in the last case, myself) compliments the look of the building with an optimistic outlook, the angry mob of doom and gloom comes and rains on my parade.
I get that you don't like it. I got it the first time. The second time was unessessary but maybe you felt like repetition was needed to get your point across. The twentieth time was just overkill. Let those of us who want to think of M:BO as a positive thing think our way and stop pointing out that you think the pipes look like death. They're just pipes.
How the hell does it fit better on Sunset Boulevard at DHS, a romanticized vintage Hollywood, better than Hollywood Land at DCA, a generic movie backlot? Also the DCA version is just a discount version of the original at DHS, plus all the major Marvel character rights belong to Universal in Orlando. Try explaining to a tourist why all the other Marvel rides are in a different park. Saying the Florida version should be re-themed is just plain wrong.DHS' Tower is better suited to this re-theme than DCA's, and the attraction fits the theme of DHS as a park whereas it doesn't with DCA. This should have been in Florida.
How the hell does it fit better on Sunset Boulevard at DHS, a romanticized vintage Hollywood, better than Hollywood Land at DCA, a generic movie backlot?
True but it be incredibly easy to just re-theme it. The street leading to the tower is just bare walls with some posters.This is somewhat false. Hollywood Land isn't themed solely to a backlot.
How the hell does it fit better on Sunset Boulevard at DHS, a romanticized vintage Hollywood, better than Hollywood Land at DCA, a generic movie backlot? Also the DCA version is just a discount version of the original at DHS, plus all the major Marvel character rights belong to Universal in Orlando. Try explaining to a tourist why all the other Marvel rides are in a different park. Saying the Florida version should be re-themed is just plain wrong.
Except for the fact that they would then have to retheme the entire Sunset Boulevard which would so not be worth it as it is already one of the land's that has the most foot traffic in WDW. RRC could be returned and begin the start of a new Marvel land that connects to Animation, but to get rid of the impeccably themed Tot which is extremely popular and the experience starts when you enter Hollywood Boulevard and then truly by Sunset Boulevard.1. DCA is themed to California, this attraction doesn't take place in California.
2. DHS theme is IP-based lands. Star Wars Land to the left, Muppet Courtyard next, Toy Story Land straight ahead. It makes sense to theme the area to the right as another IP-based land. Otherwise its like having Adventureland, Frontierland, Fantasyland, and instead of Tomorrowland, it is another arm of Main Street. A Marvel/Superhero retheme of TOT and RRC completes the park AND a Guardians attraction actually fits the park.
3. DCA's version is an improvement over the original Tower. Tower needs an upgrade regardless.
4. DHS' Tower has space for AA's and show scenes, something DCA's does not. This space gives the imagineers more room to help tell an action based story whereas DCA's has room only for projection.
5. Disney can use Guardians. They can use Dr. Strange. They can use Big Hero 6 and The Incredibles. They have plenty of superhero properties available.
1. DCA is themed to California, this attraction doesn't take place in California.
2. DHS theme is IP-based lands. Star Wars Land to the left, Muppet Courtyard next, Toy Story Land straight ahead. It makes sense to theme the area to the right as another IP-based land. Otherwise its like having Adventureland, Frontierland, Fantasyland, and instead of Tomorrowland, it is another arm of Main Street. A Marvel/Superhero retheme of TOT and RRC completes the park AND a Guardians attraction actually fits the park.
3. DCA's version is an improvement over the original Tower. Tower needs an upgrade regardless.
4. DHS' Tower has space for AA's and show scenes, something DCA's does not. This space gives the imagineers more room to help tell an action based story whereas DCA's has room only for projection.
5. Disney can use Guardians. They can use Dr. Strange. They can use Big Hero 6 and The Incredibles. They have plenty of superhero properties available.
1. Neither does "Cars"- if anything Radiator Springs is in a fictional version of Arizona, and who knows where Bugs Land is supposed to be.
2. It's not as if California Adventure doesn't have Bugsland and Carsland. The trend since day one has been to replace the California stuff with IP. Trend ain't stopping now.
3. California Adventure's version was an "improvement" only in the sense that it was cheaper to build and probably cheaper to maintain. The miniaturized queue, lack of lateral car motion, and the fact that their Tower wasn't the anchor attraction in an entire themed land centered around its particular niche in time and place all made it roundly inferior to the Florida original.
4. I wouldn't be so sure of that; there's less space up there than you would think. Most of the effects in the hallway and 5th Dimension show scenes are accomplished with projection, mirrors, and forced perspective. There's certainly more room than in the California version, but not that much more space.
5. The only way a superhero-themed land at a Disney park is going to make sense to corporate, or even to most park guests, is if it exploits the most popular elements of the "Marvel Cinematic Universe". That means Spiderman, Captain America, and Robert Downey Jr. Everything else is a distant second, with Dr. Strange being a distant fifth or sixth.
The DCA version was an improvement as it focused on the ghost story and less on being self aware. The DCA version was scary. The DHS version is campy.
True but it be incredibly easy to just re-theme it. The street leading to the tower is just bare walls with some posters.
Ok, you're going to have to explain this distinction because I have no idea where you're coming from here.
Easy to re-theme what, exactly? And "bare walls with posters?" What are these walls you refer to?
I posted this over in News & Rumors and I thought this would obviously be more relevant here:
"As much as I cannot stand the placement of Frozen at Norway and on top of that how much I loved Maelstrom, at least it improved the technology and vastly improved the queue. It's technically an upgrade to a ride that needed it.
The Tower of Terror on the other hand... is just a travesty. I never got to ride the one at California Adventure but instead I rode the clone at Walt Disney Studios Paris and it was still very good. Not as good as Florida's obviously, but still a must do. For how high-tech, thematically perfect, and popular Tot was it's insanity to remove some of the best theming Disney has ever done. Even for the sake of synergy it doesn't seem like it will ever be worth it (unless they are having it as part of a Marvel land). If a Marvel land does in fact come then as much as I love it it's not so bad for DCA, but the entire Gotg overlay was just to get a tie-in quick for the upcoming Vol. 2. I really do hope they do announce a Marvel land though as if they don't it will always remain a travesty."
Animation's side. Plus the backside of Hyperion.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.