Yes.are people still crying about this?
OK the blue tube on the left of the image, is that part of the new exterior? Because it looks like a construction waste chute.
View attachment 195942
are people still crying about this? because so far the outside looks way better than I expected, can't wait until the ride is completed. i don't even watch marvel movies. sucks that people have their underwear stuck up their butt with this.
Looks like a million bucks compared to what you can see at a real 'board walk'. From the Jersey shore, I give you pizza clown...
View attachment 196064
It looks exactly like what it is - pipes bolted to a pueblo-deco building that has been repainted.
I don't know... aside from the shape of the building, it's starting to become pretty hard to recognize any previous architecture that tied it back to pueblo-deco or old Hollywood or whatever it was originally supposed to be and was never really that good at to begin with.
Holy crap. I've forgotten how bad it was. It was so bad, and I'll always remember that, but the sheer lack of theming has left me with nothing to remember about it. this... is cheap. This is the height of corporate narcissism, and disregard for the public. Thank heavens for the internet; I really believe it is a powerful tool throughout society against the practice of "let them eat cake."This is what cheap looks like to me.
are people still crying about this? because so far the outside looks way better than I expected, can't wait until the ride is completed. i don't even watch marvel movies. sucks that people have their underwear stuck up their butt with this.
Holy crap. I've forgotten how bad it was. It was so bad, and I'll always remember that, but the sheer lack of theming has left me with nothing to remember about it. this... is cheap.
I can understand not being fond of MB's asthetics, but to say it's a cheap overlay based on what's been revealed so far is absurd. The stuff they just added to Autopia is a cheap overlay, not this.
When you look at the quality and cost of a project, it helps if you keep the scale in mind. For the size of a project like GotG, it is being done quickly and cheaply. That was the whole reason the project moved forward - to get Marvel into Disneyland quickly with as little cost as possible.
I will just say that until the inside is seen we won't know the real size and scope of this project. The outside may have been the least costly portion of the project, and maybe that way for a reason.
I've tried to keep an open mind about the interior and the attraction itself, but Disney's promotional materials so far have suggested that not a whole lot is being invested into the interior as well. The lobby and libraries will likely be very different, but the boiler room is apparently remaining with only a few changes. There's not a whole lot that can be changed with the attraction itself, and I would imagine that it will feel very different with basically similar show scenes.
When you look at the quality and cost of a project, it helps if you keep the scale in mind. For the size of a project like GotG, it is being done quickly and cheaply.
Quickly yes, but you're equating that with cheap. Do you know what the budget for this project was?
The amount of time it takes to complete a project is closely related to the cost and extent of the project. This is especially true with the way that Disney has tended to fund and manage projects historically. It isn't the only way that you can estimate the cost of a project without access to information that isn't publicly available. Repainting the building and this kind of exterior work is comparatively inexpensive. Some might still find a lot to like here - that's a separate question. I'm sure with WDI's inflated costs, the total project budget is an impressive number in "real world" terms.
then dont buy a ticket or annual pass if you dont like change.. win win for me, less crowds!!People have different opinions. Get over it.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.