Animaniac93-98
Well-Known Member
A 30+ minute CGI movie?
I imagine that ate up a lot of the budget.
I imagine that ate up a lot of the budget.
Has anyone ridden this ride yet? Are there any reviews?
Well here is a video and it really is less than a second for the Yeti. I believe that if the shadow Yeti where he tears the track didn't work it would be more of a disaster. I believe the Yeti is shown around 3:10
That’s just not true, there are not millions of people who care about AAs like you do. To insinuate it’s “just” a ride and not a theme park attraction if it doesn’t have AAs is one of the dumbest and most pretentious things I’ve read on here in a while.The best AA are what make the attraction(not a ride) so good for me and millions of others People may not think hey it must have AA, but invariably the best AA attractions are super good and have staying power and better than just a ride. I think that's the point, some of us were Hoping Guardians would lean little more attraction than just ride, more a hybrid.
The 25 Most Incredible Theme Park Animatronics on Earth - Park Lore
It wasn’t too long ago that a theme park attraction was lifeless without Audio-Animatronics. In fact, the number and complexity of these robotic animated figures was often proportional to a ride’s budget and success! Put simply: if you wanted to blow audiences away, animatronics figures were the...parklore.com
Because people are forming strawman vs what is actually being talked about.but im failing to understand why the court of Niche opinion has come to the verdict that the ride is terrible
Yeah, it gave me horrible motion sickness once. It did not give my GF motion sickness, but she still hated it because of how much it jerks you around -- her neck hurt after we rode.
I've also been on it once without getting sick, and it was still unpleasant -- more importantly, though all of the broom flying parts bored me. Only a small part of the ride is actually entertaining to me even if you ignore the ride system.
I have already said this on here, but it bears repeating. Also the room with the railings appears to be after the galaxarium ramp but before the pre show rooms. Maybe the "upstairs" bit is some what limited, but im failing to understand why the court of Niche opinion has come to the verdict that the ride is terrible
Cmon, they only had half a billion bucks.I don't mean to say it looks bad.
I just thought it would be bigger, I guess? Like more of a domed ceiling with a larger projection? It looks a lot smaller than I thought it would be -- I was expecting it to basically fill the whole room. I think the rest of the room being completely empty makes the size (or lack thereof) stand out more.
But again, it's just a video/couple of photos and it could look different in person. Don't really have a sense of scale yet.
It's a largely featureless room with a curved plastic aesthetic. As Monty said, its very reminiscent of TT in what seems to be the emerging, generic Future World style. Nothing about it reads Xander, and ABSOLUTELY nothing about it evokes Guardians. Show those images to someone unfamiliar with what WDW is currently building and I highly doubt they are even able to identify this as a Marvel attraction.
You mean like in the queue for Festival of The Lion King?Otherwise these people are terrible at forming any semblance of a line.
While I still thoroughly enjoy everest, it was much better with the yeti moving. I was there the year it opened and it really felt like the yeti was going to get you.Did you ever experience the ride when the yeti was working?
Something, something, oh no something went wrong, whooooooooooosh into space.I'm a little surprised that people haven't figured out a few more story elements. Between the concept art (even back to some of the earliest pieces) and the UOE building layouts, a lot of pieces are there that some may not have put together. Maybe a good starting question is when do you "leave" the UoE Building/Exhibit?
You are forgetting something.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.