peter11435
Well-Known Member
NoIs Joe Rhode still in charge of Marvel in the parks?
NoIs Joe Rhode still in charge of Marvel in the parks?
The coaster to dark ride ratio begs to differ with that assessment.That’s pretty much exactly what this is going to be.
The coaster to dark ride ratio begs to differ with that assessment.
Scott Drake.Is Joe Rhode still in charge of Marvel in the parks?
I think this ride will have a lot great visuals. There is a lot that can be done with the Guardians.
Look at what they did with Mission Breakout over in Cali. There is so much eye candy on that ride it's unbelievable.
Your comparing a ride that utilized existing show space (from a prior ride) and more importantly goes up and down a few times reusing the same space. (A much smaller space) in not arguing that there cant be lots done im simply skeptical of disneys desire to spend money to fill that massive box that can fit spaceship earth inside it with detail.
I'm not sure what you're referring to here. MB is almost entirely screen/projection based.
It is pretty simple.
A lot of things can be done with the Black Box idea. With a rollercoaster its actually perfect because it can surround you. They could even do rethemings very easily for the holidays.
It is pretty simple.
A lot of things can be done with the Black Box idea. With a rollercoaster its actually perfect because it can surround you. They could even do rethemings very easily for the holidays.
This seems like a souped up Space Mountain to me... with GotG characters thrown in.
Project Sausalito is the attraction. It is a Marvel project, not an Epcot project. Fitzgerald didn’t want the Guardians of the Galaxy in Epcot.
He wasn’t on the project.
Because that’s not really a key part of creative development and it’s the biggest new thing coming to the “new” Epcot.firzgerald was on stage talking about guardians (and the whole Epcot project) in 2017. If it was a marvel project why wasn’t Rhodes the one presenting it?
^^^What are you thinking it will be? Maybe I’ve missed something.
My opinion is that Gringotts is an awesome attraction, because of the seamless "amazing" theming that starts from the minute you see the building and then ends when you get off the coaster. However if evaluated in a vacuum the ride itself is good, but not amazing. This is a case of the whole attraction being better than the individual parts. I want to reiterate I think Gringotts is amazing. Was just trying to relay some thoughts about the actual ride itself. My point is I don't think GOG needs to copy Gringotts. They need to put out a great attraction though and I honestly don't mind if there is an abundance of screens on a rollercoaster. Cant wait to see the finished product!Yeah, this appears to be much more of a coaster then Gringotts.
Because that’s not really a key part of creative development and it’s the biggest new thing coming to the “new” Epcot.
First and only most likely. I don’t think they’ll make an E Ticket for any of the other random heroes they could possibly have rights to.Bruh they threw Rhode in front of all the PR for the Guardians overlay of Tower of Terror but not have him pull the curtains back for Disney's first built from-the-ground up Marvel e-ticket for Walt Disney World??
There is no divine rule that whoever is presenting an attraction has to be a certain position working on it. Mission: Breakout! was not being built as the same time as a large park wide project.Bruh they threw Rhode in front of all the PR for the Guardians overlay of Tower of Terror but not have him pull the curtains back for Disney's first built from-the-ground up Marvel e-ticket for Walt Disney World??
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.