Earl Sweatpants
Well-Known Member
The average theme park guest could care less. Some probably don't even know that Universal and Disney are two different companies.
'Merica
Last edited:
The average theme park guest could care less. Some probably don't even know that Universal and Disney are two different companies.
Yeah what I get from his post is that A. Guardians may not be plastered on the Marquee...and B. it may not include any of the Guardians...only C. Characters associated with them like....The CollectorThe name really should enter into it from a legal standpoint, it's the use of the characters that is in the licensing agreement, not their names.
Yeah what I get from his post is that A. Guardians may not be plastered on the Marquee...and B. it may not include any of the Guardians...only C. Characters associated with them like....The Collector
Since no one ever listens to me anyway, heres the Collector's wikipedia page. Smells like Avengers/FF family to me....Yeah what I get from his post is that A. Guardians may not be plastered on the Marquee...and B. it may not include any of the Guardians...only C. Characters associated with them like....The Collector
Since no one ever listens to me anyway, heres the Collector's wikipedia page. Smells like Avengers/FF family to me....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collector_(comics)
Yeah, out of all the characters from Guardians, The Collector is the most sure thing of a no-go of any.Since no one ever listens to me anyway, heres the Collector's wikipedia page. Smells like Avengers/FF family to me....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collector_(comics)
Yeah what I get from his post is that A. Guardians may not be plastered on the Marquee...and B. it may not include any of the Guardians...only C. Characters associated with them like....The Collector
Just to say they did it. That's all Chapek wants is to get his way.They can't use the name "Marvel" and if they aren't going to use the Guardians name, or any of the major characters, what's the point?
Did you guys know that Tom Corless broke the story about Guardians of the Galaxy taking over DCA's Tower of Terror?View attachment 157080
Then on Twitter...
View attachment 157081
UPDATE: You are blocked from following @***** and viewing @*****'s Tweets.
It's not that I don't want it, I just don't trust current Disney management with it. It's been how long now since they got Marvel? All they have to show for it so far is Stark Tours in Hong Kong and Guardians of the Tower in Anaheim.Some people just don't want Marvel in the parks, and the contract is their best hope. A few years ago people said we wouldn't see Big Hero 6 in WDW because of the contract.
The use of the name "Marvel" however applies all over the US which is why the DL exhibit was called "Super Hero HQ" and not "Marvel HQ."The exclusivity with Universal only applies east of the Mississippi.
Even with how PC Disney tries to be, the stretch that Ellen's tweet was racist is laughable. There was no intent there. If Bolt was offended by it, I'm guessing Ellen would have apologized but the intent was certainly not there. That alone isn't reason enough to close an attraction that already has Michael Richards in it.
They have for special events...Have you noticed that the Guardians have never appeared as a Meet & Greet during regular park hours? Seems strange for an IP that they want in the parks so badly...
They can't use the name "Marvel" and if they aren't going to use the Guardians name, or any of the major characters, what's the point?
No kidding. Certain people that jump on the everything's racist bandwagon need to look at themselves in the mirror because they're so obsessed with the matter. The point was simple, the dude is the fast person on the planet, and his speed is amazing. He could be green, white, purple, black, or whatever for I care. The intent was obviously not what the Internet whiners made it out to be. Ugh. Sometimes you really wonder if we're in this endless spiral of stupidity.
And you don't think it's just a little weird that the characters that they are clamoring to get into the park have only ever appeared TWO TIMES at WDW?They have for special events...
3, but Im not counting. And you bring up a good point, at least having Star Lord would be fairly easy to have him in Tomorrowland - they have enough guys who could do the role.And you don't think it's just a little weird that the characters that they are clamoring to get into the park have only ever appeared TWO TIMES at WDW?
There's obviously some reason why they haven't appeared on a daily basis yet.
well thats stupid.
And you don't think it's just a little weird that the characters that they are clamoring to get into the park have only ever appeared TWO TIMES at WDW?
There's obviously some reason why they haven't appeared on a daily basis yet.
Never, not even during SWW, has there been a paid cosplayer to portray Han Solo at WDW. I believe much of that goes back to Harrison Ford if i'm not mistaken.There are a lot of popular characters that don't appear on a daily basis. A Han Solo meet & greet would be hugely popular, I'd wager. Is there some sort of conspiracy afoot about that?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.