Donaldfan1934
Well-Known Member
I don't think Iger has a creative bone in his body, but at least he lets the creatives take charge on the studio side. However, I feel that's largely because he knows that there's a statistically negative correlation between executive interference and public reception/box office and not so much because he understands the flaws of that process. As long as he has movies that are consistently raking it in at the box office, the more product he can forcefully synergize across the rest of the company's divisions. He should be running Disney like Google or Apple, but instead he runs it like Toys 'R' Us.I think you would get laughed out of the room at the suggestion. The theme parks aren't treated the same way as other intellectual properties at the moment. For decades they were. It will be real interesting to see what happens in the post-Iger era with the Disney theme park empire.
Last edited: