"value" is different for every person. It is also different for every type of trip for individual people. In some cases, I will take advantage of a specific "extra cost offering". On other trips, I may just choose to keep it as cheap as possible or only take advantage of things offered as part of basic no extra cost experiences. Does allowing Springs hotel guests access to EMH damage the experience for others who chose to pay more and stay on property? To a degree yes because there are now more people in the park during EMH thus creating less opportunity to do as much as you could previously do. Will allowing people to buy extra FPs as part of their package effect the experience of other guests? Likely, as there are a limited number of FPs available and now the pool of people getting them is diminished. But, is it a choice I now have as well? Yes, so I can determine the particular value to me. After hours paid events, Cabanas, etc etc do not have an effect on others. There are 4 parks and if one closes early, just like during the Halloween or Christmas parties, I can visit another park on those evenings. Do my research and determine what is best for MY situation. But, that is a choice I can make based on what has value to me. I have a slight issue with how much they have devalued AP holders, BUT, I also recognize that if I go 25 days a year, Im paying 35/day and that in itself is a huge value. Then I can choose to eat at a sig restaurant or not. With TIW I see a value. I can choose to stay on property or not. I can choose to do a tour or not. There are still a ton of choices.
While I understand peoples assertion that things being done effect the overall experience of guests not wanting to essentially pay twice for something they already have access to, I also from person standpoint, make decisions on the park visits based on what has value to me. And this new Pay for FP option is just another choice I will be in a position to decide on for each trip.