And I'm sure they keep it due to overwhelming guest demand.yeah but it's been "only temporary" for a decade now...
And I'm sure they keep it due to overwhelming guest demand.yeah but it's been "only temporary" for a decade now...
LOL. That's so true!!!It amuses me greatly that temporary in Disney speak means years or decades .... lol
I'm glad that there is some chatter about Dinorama possibly being replaced.yeah but it's been "only temporary" for a decade now...
The way B&M moves the floor out for their floorless coasters is not the same type of movement. Even their first flying coasters had a drop floor. Disney's floor would have to drop and move away above guests' heads when Disney has become very restrictive just on props and set dressings being overhead on rides.
Going to the side does not remove the need for the floor to drop and it is still above head.Or they could do something as simple as slide the floor off to the side to open up the hole below and above each rider. I really like the idea they have here.
If this was an indoor flying coaster and a really nice looking outdoor segment then that would be fun, but I 100% agree, in that, a 'normal' coaster would suck at Disney parks.Please no.
Leave the cheap looking roller coasters to Six Flags and other budget parks. I don't mind the odd high class coaster, but too many are an excuse by those in charge to put in place attractions at budget costs.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.