mousermerf
Account Suspended
Depends - if they keep the ride system and re-do the scenery, not so much.
mousermerf said:Depends - if they keep the ride system and re-do the scenery, not so much.
mousermerf said:It can be reprogrammed - the length of the various portions of Energy were tweaked when it became Ellen's Energy Adventure. All they have to do is keep the same general path - the rest is blue sky.
pax_65 said:By this logic, the ride itself should NEVER be updated regardless of what new technologies become available.
Even when he was remembering the past, Walt Disney was always looking forward to showcase new technologies and new innovations both in his parks and in his films.
No ride or attraction should ever be "untouchable" if it can be improved with new technology. But the key word there is "improved". I think many of us get nervous because we don't necessarily trust Disney to make changes to our favorite rides - call it the Stitch effect.
Jenevra said:For example I do not think that Peter Pan or IASW should have new technology introduced.
marni1971 said:GMR requires the CM to start and stop the vehicle on each mark (within tolerence) whereas UoE can stop on a dime under computer control. The vehicles are the same in that when fully charged they could actually be driven out of the building onto level ground with all safety features disabled - ruining the chasis in the process no doubt.
Paul&chris2005 said:Some of the scenes could be updated, like the Alien scene could be replaced by something like...well thats the problem - what could you replace it with?
Harry Potter ? :lol: :brick:
mousermerf said:(vehicles were housed outdoors if more than 1 needed major maitenance).
I remember when the rumors to use this kinds of tech were very much alive, But i am so glad that the CAVE tech was never used, just so everyone get an idea of what it it is, here is some info: click heremarni1971 said:It must have been -what- 2 years ago? This was the CAVE technology rumoured to replace most of the Animatronics - and sets - on the attraction. Thank god it never happened.
Jenevra said:My point is that some rides are created for a certain purpose. For example I do not think that Peter Pan or IASW should have new technology introduced. They are meant to be a certain way. I am basically saying that if a darkride is meant to be a certain way and the crowds still like it then there really should be no reason to upgrdae it. This does not mean that some of the scenes could not change.
errr this is Blackride on my wifes account...by accident.
saltmom1 said:Paul&chris2005 said:Some of the scenes could be updated, like the Alien scene could be replaced by something like...well thats the problem - what could you replace it with?
Harry Potter ? :lol: :brick:
Wait a minute, I think you have something here, and I'm being completely serious!!! I would enjoy upgrades to this attraction, and I'm not saying the alien portion should nessisarily altered, but think of the possibilities with a harry potter themed section to this ride.
Most of the scenes are very detailed environments and very immersive in my opinion, and a potter section wouldn't be any less. I think we should talk about this.
And what about maybe a star wars episode three section with the Ani/Obi Mustafar battle?
Crazy Harry said:I think GMR serves it's purpose the way it is, but video/spiderman technology would be the perfect medium for something like the Incredibles.
pax_65 said:That's a great idea! Hopefully the Imagineers are already thinking about that... if we had a 3D "in your face" Incredibles ride, maybe I'd stop worrying about updating GMR (at least until I see Whoopi singing and hear Robin scream "GOOD MORNING VIETNAM!" again. Which come to think of it, will be in less than 2 weeks!) :sohappy:
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.