_caleb
Well-Known Member
Worse for you, maybe. And maybe for me. But maybe not worse for everyone.Then the future of disney parks are heading in a worse direction than I thought.
Worse for you, maybe. And maybe for me. But maybe not worse for everyone.Then the future of disney parks are heading in a worse direction than I thought.
I consider myself to be a “die-hard,” and I haven’t felt the main audience for some time.
Right. And this does seem to be a somewhat unique situation in terms of the rational and context of the retheme. Also, this sort of document isn’t typically shared in this way (little actual marketing polish) or this early in the process.
This certainly didn’t seem like a promo piece to me.
I did! Can you think of any group in between “Disney die-hards” (buy this I mean people like use to spend lots of time discussing like this) and “the general public?” I can.The holes in this seem to be greater than the Jungle Cruise leaks.
You said this is not for the die hards, but this is also not a promo piece.
I still, to this day, thoroughly believe that was a lie. Or at least an exaggeration of the truth. I know the 'insider' that shared this is a bit controversial and not always reliable- but the take that it was a blue sky concept pitched at one point but not actively developed makes the most sense.
Just look at how much the project has changed in three years- Disney made the announcement then decided to design an attraction.
I did! Can you think of any group in between “Disney die-hards” (buy this I mean people like use to spend lots of time discussing like this) and “the general public?” I can.
It’s set after the film, though.The criticism of the frog characters in the movie is that they remained in that state for too much of the film. To leave that out of the ride entirely would be a massive over correction. And a mistake. Although I fear you are right.
Of course it could be neither of those extreme options. Elements of Disney’s plan for the ride could have changed—even significantly—over that period of time. That would make it: true that they’ve been working on this for a long time and also true that the design has depth.That is the rub right? It either is a huge set of multiple ongoing lies or the design is really limited and bad.
It has to be one or the other, or both. It can't be neither.
It’s set after the film, though.
In my experience, promotional releases for a new attraction are written by Disney’s marketing team, not a PR guy from WDI. And typically, they do a pretty good job of teasing the audience with elements of what their experience will be like when riding the ride.That reads a release from Disney on the story and backstory of the ride opening in two years would be a promo.
He's not the leader on this project (even if I suspect he might be taking the lead over the interior scene designs), and he's also an independent consultant instead of a full employee at Disney. There's probably also a fear at Disney of allowing an "old white man" to "upstage" Carter's team in any way on their own project. Keep in mind that Tony Baxter created Splash Mountain in the first place. And with Disney trying to purge all traces of that ride from existence, along with any connecting threads, that's another reason they'd probably want to downplay his involvement in the replacement.I have always assumed he was included in the initial announcement in an attempt to placate Splash fans. He's done a handful of interviews since the announcement and he mentions Tiana briefly in one of them, but he isn't exactly a 'PR mouthpiece' if he hasn't actually been a part of any of the ride's publicity.
It's not even a bus driver rumor, they literally said they were joking and didn't actually know.I'd love for Baxter to be more involved in WDI, so I hope this is the case- but until I see something with his name on it in the PR for the ride I think the 'bus driver' rumor is more likely.
Because we’ve been around awhile, seen many trends, experienced many different things over that time, and see how things are now or are heading and it has us “old/legacy” fans concernedI really don’t mind being called a “Disney apologist” or “pixie-duster” or whatever, because I’m admittedly a fan of the parks and the films (well, some of them). But I still don’t understand why so many here mock and deride about opinions.
Some opinions are better stated than others, and some are based on more information than others, but in the end, hostility takes the fun out of it for me. I do try to base my opinions on what I think Disney is trying to do. And I am honest about when I think they missed the mark.
Of course it could be neither of those extreme options. Elements of Disney’s plan for the ride could have changed—even significantly—over that period of time. That would make it: true that they’ve been working on this for a long time and also true that the design has depth.
In my experience, promotional releases for a new attraction are written by Disney’s marketing team, not a PR guy from WDI. And typically, they do a pretty good job of teasing the audience with elements of what their experience will be like when riding the ride.
This doesn’t read like that, so I’m assuming it’s because it wasn’t intended to be “promotional” beyond a sort of “behind the scenes” Imagineering piece.
You have my respect for offering an alternative perspective. I may be feeling more pessimistic than you, but I truly appreciate the balance—and civility—you’re bringing to the discussion.I really don’t mind being called a “Disney apologist” or “pixie-duster” or whatever, because I’m admittedly a fan of the parks and the films (well, some of them). But I still don’t understand why so many here mock and deride about opinions.
Some opinions are better stated than others, and some are based on more information than others, but in the end, hostility takes the fun out of it for me. I do try to base my opinions on what I think Disney is trying to do. And I am honest about when I think they missed the mark.
“Celebrity entrepreneurs”. Not “hard working bayou girl”.Women Entrepreneurs Take the Stage During New York's Jazz Age | Entrepreneur
These trailblazing business owners have much to teach their contemporary counterparts about taking risks and acting independently.www.entrepreneur.com
How many of those celebrity entrepreneurs were turned into a frog?“Celebrity entrepreneurs”. Not “hard working bayou girl”.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.