MerlinTheGoat
Well-Known Member
World Showcase has always lacked as many rides as it should have received. I would agree with the notion that it needs more quality rides, but I disagree that shoehorning in characters (either with rides or meet and greets) is an adequate solution for that issue. They just should have went ahead and built the rest of the planned attractions that never got finished, the proper way of addressing that problem.Well, that's just it. I wouldn't take my 2 and 7 year olds to France, and think they would enjoy it as much as me.
PLEASE don't get me wrong...on our honeymoon we adored the World showcase. I'm just saying i personally don't feel that Belle reading a book in front of France cripples the experience for me...and if it give my daughters a reason to be excited to be there, so much the better.
I also agree that previous versions of Epcot was much better suited to a wide age range. But for world showcase it has always been a bit of an issue. Is using characters kids know and love to get them interested in their country of origin really so objectionable?
Rhine River Cruise for instance was going to go in Germany, the show building apparently still exists in some form (unless i'm mistaken) and Biergarten was built in what was supposed to have been the loading area for the boats. There were plenty of other plans for rides that were never built at World Showcase, some of the more famous ones including plans for both a Matterhorn clone and a Mt Fuji coaster among i'm sure many others. There were also never built pavilions such as Spain, Venezuela, Israel etc, some of which would also have had some new rides. All great ideas that were never built but would have addressed World Showcase's ride problem without compromising the park's identity.