cw1982
Well-Known Member
So that means you can jump in the air and end up inside of elsa?
wow... lmao...
So that means you can jump in the air and end up inside of elsa?
Usually its right before the fireworks. Like 9-ish... someone would have to dig through the WDWMagic news archive to double check tho.
Emperor palpatine in speedo.. no thanks!A Star Wars water park. Now that'd be something else.
The only reason I can think of.. UP resonated more with adults than children.why doesnt UP get any consideration for the parks yet?
The increase in DHS attendance will come at the expense of DAK's attendance though.This sounds like a sure fired winner. This should result in a big increase in attendance at DHS. I wish it lasted longer because we won't be there until 9/20.
Blizzard Beach could easily be changed over to a Frozen theme if they so wished...I like the idea of a frozen themed water park.
Cars is incredibly popular from a merchandise standpoint and home movie follow ups. They are both incredibly popular franchises with kids.Cars was not the highest grossing animated film of all time. It was almost considered a "flop" by Pixar standards, the only thing that saved it was it became a successful merchandise franchise. Cars is barely comparable to Frozen's success.
This poses a general question for the fan community. In a perfectly themed world do the "new" fairytales like Tangled and Frozen belong in Fantasyland or in Hollywood Studios. Perhaps the better question is that should Fantasyland by reserved exclusively for hand drawn animation properties? Does that matter?I am too. Alas.... youre talking about guests that booked 6-8 months ago and are now visiting while the kids are out of school. Thats the demographic we're trying to get.
Gotta think big picture and see the entire forest.
Is 'Frozen' an evergreen property? Maybe. Time will tell. I think so. I cant stand this property but I say green light an entire Arrondale in the back of DHS. Make Frozenland. Make it and include some of the overhangs and glass/steel ceilings that cover parts of DA. Its gonna last and if they build it to the level of Carsland, it will make an insane return.
It will be interesting to see if the two month Frozen push is enough to have DHS move past DAK in attendance.The increase in DHS attendance will come at the expense of DAK's attendance though.
This poses a general question for the fan community. In a perfectly themed world do the "new" fairytales like Tangled and Frozen belong in Fantasyland or in Hollywood Studios. Perhaps the better question is that should Fantasyland by reserved exclusively for hand drawn animation properties? Does that matter?
I'm actually starting to like the idea of Frozen in Hollywood Studios. Unlike Magic Kingdom there's plenty of space to take out something (SoA) and easily build a whole land with multiple rides. Then Frozen crowds could be diverted away from Magic Kingdom and increase attendance at another park that needs it more. It makes so much sense it'll probably never happen.IMO, it depends on how they're being represented. If we're talking rides, the princessy fairy tales should go in FL. If it's a show, then a setup like BatB and TLM makes sense at HS, since those are live performances and go well with the idea of Hollywood.
I honestly don't think most tourists care if the Yeti is working. I doubt it'd be much of a driver.It will be interesting to see if the two month Frozen push is enough to have DHS move past DAK in attendance.
I'll throw this out there... Is the cost to run this party for 2 months more or less than the cost to fix the Yeti? There have been people on here that claim the Yeti can be fixed without closing the attraction. Would a fully functional yeti be a comparable attendance boost or will that just result in stagnant attendance but higher guest satisfaction?
I'm actually starting to like the idea of Frozen in Hollywood Studios. Unlike Magic Kingdom there's plenty of space to take out something (SoA) and easily build a whole land with multiple rides. Then Frozen crowds could be diverted away from Magic Kingdom and increase attendance at another park that needs it more. It makes so much sense it'll probably never happen.
Incorrect.The loser if Disney does not get the fireworks is their main supplier. Disney is the largest purchaser of fireworks in the country. If I had their contract I would put them first even if that means breaking some other smaller contracts. You have to take care of your best customer. Disney will get what ever they need you can count on it.
I see where you're coming from but I think the best thing to do with Hollywood Studios would be to sort of take inspiration from what Universal Studios did with Springfield and Diagon Alley. Immerse people in the worlds of the IP and move away from the studio theme. Disney could easily do this with Pixar, Frozen and Star Wars in Hollywood Studios. To be perfectly honest though I would be fine with anything that involves keeping Maelstrom.I see the benefit of alleviating some of the MK crowd, but honestly I just don't think a whole land works with the theme of HS... at least not as much as it would at MK. I like the idea of a Star Wars land at HS far better than a Frozen land there, particularly given that Frozen, while super hyped up right now, has yet to prove itself as something that will be popular enough to warrant such a land by the time it would open. I think having a long-term nod to the movie in the form of a show or even an extra meet and greet makes sense at HS, but definitely not an entire land.
Maybe since JK Rowling won't allow a Potter meet and greet, they should shut down both Potter lands?
MK will be the place for the meet and greet, while DHS will be a Frozen summer party. I think it works to help spread the Frozen crowds out.
I dont think TDO had much choice in the matter, I think this is being forced on them from Burbank.
It will be interesting to see if the two month Frozen push is enough to have DHS move past DAK in attendance.
I'll throw this out there... Is the cost to run this party for 2 months more or less than the cost to fix the Yeti? There have been people on here that claim the Yeti can be fixed without closing the attraction. Would a fully functional yeti be a comparable attendance boost or will that just result in stagnant attendance but higher guest satisfaction?
I see where you're coming from but I think the best thing to do with Hollywood Studios would be to sort of take inspiration from what Universal Studios did with Springfield and Diagon Alley. Immerse people in the worlds of the IP and move away from the studio theme. Disney could easily do this with Pixar, Frozen and Star Wars in Hollywood Studios. To be perfectly honest though I would be fine with anything that involves keeping Maelstrom.
I see the benefit of alleviating some of the MK crowd, but honestly I just don't think a whole land works with the theme of HS... at least not as much as it would at MK. I like the idea of a Star Wars land at HS far better than a Frozen land there.
Besides, Frozen, while super hyped up right now, has yet to prove itself as something that will be popular enough to warrant such a land by the time it would open, I would think devoting an entire "land" to it as a long-term investment might not be the best move. I think having a long-term nod to the movie in the form of a show or even an extra meet and greet makes sense at HS, but definitely not an entire land.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.