But they don't supply an apple Danish maker.Can't make coffee in the room with the coffee maker?
But they don't supply an apple Danish maker.Can't make coffee in the room with the coffee maker?
Easy bake ovens with apple danish mix coming to all resort rooms confirmed.But they don't supply an apple Danish maker.
amennew??
Oh I didn't hear it like that. I see how it can read that way in the transcript, but I didn't hear it like "our guests are fatties," I heard it like "haha wouldn't it be good for all of us if portions were smaller?"
Food companies do this because their customers are very price sensitive so they cut portion size to keep prices relatively static.It’s funny that so many people here are upset about this, but food companies have been doing this for years.
They are just not under the microscope like Disney.
Remember when a container of ice cream at the grocery store was 64 ounces?
That was reduced down to 56oz, then 48oz. For the same price.
I just recently noticed my 12 oz packages of chocolate chips are now 11oz and some 8oz packages of shredded cheese are now 7oz.
Oh I didn't hear it like that. I see how it can read that way in the transcript, but I didn't hear it like "our guests are fatties," I heard it like "haha wouldn't it be good for all of us if portions were smaller?"
It actually wouldn’t be good for all of us if portions were smaller. Not everyone is trying to lose weight. Someone in a position of power needs to be more thoughtful in how she speaks. If she has a toxic relationship with food, she should choose to eat less. But, her experience is not everyone’s experience, and a company changing Splash Mountain for the reasons given should understand that. If you are CFO, focus on financials. “Food prices are sky-rocketing everywhere, and we are not immune to this, so we will be forced to either raise prices or, where appropriate, reduce portion sizes. The decision will be specific to the food item. We can’t make a Mickey pretzel smaller since people expect that item to look a certain way, so the price will need to rise. On the other hand, we can look to switch our French fry vendor or reduce portion size and include affordable, more healthful side options to interested guests. In all cases, we will maintain the Disney standard that our guests rightfully expect and we hope our guests will understand these necessary changes that are not unlike decisions they are now facing when they visit the grocery store.” Blame economics, not your guests.Oh I didn't hear it like that. I see how it can read that way in the transcript, but I didn't hear it like "our guests are fatties," I heard it like "haha wouldn't it be good for all of us if portions were smaller?"
Agreed, people at that level only exist to schmooze and be a public face of senior leadership.Someone in her position should know by now no matter how she may have meant it, the optics when reporting on it would not be good. Her rank/experience - she should know better.
It was an off the cuff remark that she should not have made.
Did you listen to the call, or just read the transcript? She didn't do what you say she did.It actually wouldn’t be good for all of us if portions were smaller. Not everyone is trying to lose weight. Someone in a position of power needs to be more thoughtful in how she speaks. If she has a toxic relationship with food, she should choose to eat less. But, her experience is not everyone’s experience, and a company changing Splash Mountain for the reasons given should understand that. If you are CFO, focus on financials. “Food prices are sky-rocketing everywhere, and we are not immune to this, so we will be forced to either raise prices or, where appropriate, reduce portion sizes. The decision will be specific to the food item. We can’t make a Mickey pretzel smaller since people expect that item to look a certain way, so the price will need to rise. On the other hand, we can look to switch our French fry vendor or reduce portion size and include affordable, more healthful side options to interested guests. In all cases, we will maintain the Disney standard that our guests rightfully expect and we hope our guests will understand these necessary changes that are not unlike decisions they are now facing when they visit the grocery store.” Blame economics, not your guests.
Did the literal words come out of her mouth or was she mis-quoted? If she said the words, she said the words.Did you listen to the call, or just read the transcript? She didn't do what you say she did.
Oh I didn't hear it like that. I see how it can read that way in the transcript, but I didn't hear it like "our guests are fatties," I heard it like "haha wouldn't it be good for all of us if portions were smaller?"
Disney is doing this because their customers are very price INsensitive and they want to see how far they can push them before they change their habits.
Charge more and provide less. This is right out of the Disneyparks playbook.The CFO of the Walt Disney Company brought up " Cutting portion size " to increase profits. Also stated this would
" Be good for some peoples waistlines " . This profits are all that matters has reached the ultimate . So get ready
for the end of Boma buffet-Ohana will become Prix fix-and all other buffets will be gonzo. I am tired of the Take
take take and never give back.
And Chapek and Iger were paid 14million and 21 million last year....
that's a year...
Now lets think where could we shave some money to keep profits up?
While these calls are meant for business, Disney knows they have above the average of customers who own little bits of stock, bloggers who report everything and some of those people listen in more than for a widget company. And since they’re an entertainment company, we are used to their business stuff coming with a little more polish than this.
pssssssst, this literally happened all over the job spectrum for the past almost 2 years. 401K matches were halted. Raises were postponed. Salaries and hours were indeed cut. And this impacted people making a hell of a lot less than $1M, much less 10x more.That was their fairly earned, negotiated salary. How would you feel if your boss came to you and asked you to take a pay cut because times were tough?
Customers have the right to do their due diligence to avoid making a bad investment aka consumer decision as any investor. If a company is going to be so blatant about how they view their customers and how they manipulate their product in a public format than they should expect whatever fallout comes. It still in the company’s best interest to not say the quiet parts out loud. A customer has no obligation to forget they are the customer when they hear something that is intended for another audience. Customers have a right to fight for their best interests at all times too.That was their fairly earned, negotiated salary. How would you feel if your boss came to you and asked you to take a pay cut because times were tough? How would you feel if your boss asked you to take a pay cut so your company could buy gifts for their clients?
Yeah but this goes both ways. If customers want to listen in on the calls, and try to glean some nugget of information, they should know the audience these calls are meant for, and have some basic understanding of what they are for.
People often try to remind the fans that Disney is a business, but judging from some of the comments here, that isn't really something the fans are ready to understand. Everyone who has an interest in Disney, whether it's executives (thru compensation), Investors (thru dividends), Cast Members (thru wages), or customers (thru services) has a say in where the money needs to go, and if you're not ready to have a conversation with the investors seeking to have more of the money flow their way, then do yourself a favor and skip listening to the investor calls.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.