FigmentsBrightIdeas
Well-Known Member
I mean, I get that.. but like I mentioned above. I’m conflicted about it cause on one hand, again, super cool to see more development art.. always on board seeing any development art featuring Figment and/or Dreamfinder we haven’t seen before but at the same time, somewhat worrying they’re doubling down on theming from the current iteration in new pavilion additions or changes lately when it’s the version the majority thinks is a massive downgrade from the original. Almost as if they think it’s worth keeping the way it is, that they “already fixed it”, if ya know what I mean. Sorta like Iger implied at Tony Baxter’s Disney Legends Award 10 years or so ago.Perhaps an unpopular opinion, but I like that it's mostly art from the 2002 version. We don't have much of that available online, and there's plenty from the original attraction out there.
Though granted, atleast its art from the scene that most closely resembles anything seen in the original, atleast I can say that. Hey, like. These would be cool to see in a future art book regarding Figment, Dreamfinder, and the Imagination pavilion. It’s a surprise Disney hasn’t done it officially yet but I def think they should (we got a small glimpse of things in The Art of Disney’s Dragons book, just not all/as much as we could see)
Last edited: