The best integrity money can buy.yep. Integrity all over the place
The best integrity money can buy.yep. Integrity all over the place
No. You had the privilege of being able to make 3 Fastpasses in advance. That's it. They were free and not skip the line passes either.
Essentially Disney was doing you a favor.
No, I remember the question I was asked: would I be willing to pay more for access to select rides if there were no crowds, guaranteed.And too many people saying that the parties were too crowded is likely how they came up with the after hours events...more money for fewer hours.
I'd bet that there was a survey to measure guest satisfaction with the parties and then another prior to implementing the after hours events.No, I remember the question I was asked: would I be willing to pay more for access to select rides if there were no crowds, guaranteed.
Be careful what you wish for. There has been no announcement yet on WDW FP system to come. You say “let’s break free!” yet you don’t know what’s being planned and as far as I can tell it’s going to cost you when it was free to everyone before. You may have chosen to not utilize FP before because it didn’t suit you to plan in advance of your trip. It’s not fun for you and too stressful. If WDW decides to go the VQ route for all major attractions among other changes to standby, you may be wishing the old FP+ never left. I wouldn’t be so quick to jump on this rumor bandwagon yetI think you are overhyping the situation you could end up in...
"Which one ride will we grab a Standby Return pass for as soon as it becomes available?
And you’ll need to adapt plans on the fly, depending on what happens."
Isn't that exactly what we all did in FP days? Look at available times, make a decision based on the current conditions and what we planned for the rest of the day? Or even pre-FP with looking at lines and availability?
Or looked at it another way... you are free to do what you want and adapt to what you see and feel like... instead of being locked into a plan that you made months ago based on the availability you were offered - instead of necessarily what you wanted in the first place.
Isn't this the __exact behavior__ people used to say why FP+ and 3 FPs wasn't a big issue? Because you could do exactly what you are saying and people were more than happy to do so?
Personally I don't find the issue of 'day of' planning vs 60/whatever days out an issue because it removes most of the hassles the 60days out presented. Tiered access, punishment for last-minute bookings, punishment for organized group trips (vs vacationers), dealing with the future vs now, lack of flexibility to adjust your plans, etc. Sure you are giving up 'piece of mind', but you are also breaking free of the chains or tearing down the exclusionary walls. That's a gain in my book.
Advanced scheduling (and the further and further pushing out of the boundary) IMO was one of the worst things DIsney has been doing. So a new model that burns that to the ground? Excellent. On the other points, I'm still trying to digest how it will play out.
This is one of the things offensive about Premier Access. You already were paying for FP+. Disney is taking that away and charging you for its replacement.
No such thing as a free lunch. Fast passes were factored into the price of a ticket. Disney wasnt doing anyone a favor, they were definitely using the FP+ system as a selling point to get you to their parks. How many people here say they visited the parks more often knowing that they could ride their favorites, its not an insignificant number.
Maybe the reason Disney is so comfortable removing so much from their parks is because guests think they were doing us a favor to begin with. No more night time parade, oh no worries they were doing us a favor by having more than one parade.
Oh I am not saying all surveys are that way. It depends on the company. An example, we had surveys done about customer satisfaction done MANY TIMES!! Sent to several 1000 people a year, but we noticed that the survey questions were, how to say loaded with one company in particular very biased questions and answers. Several other dealers we knew used the same outfit and were getting back to them glowing results. So we went to another firm and gave them the same instructions and got a TOTALLY different response. We gave both companies the same customer lists. It really showed us how some places prefer to massage the questions and answers to get the outcome that will make the purchaser happy. Now in the Disney case, its I imagine to show the board or stockholders or people on the fence about a change. It might also be to protect there own jobs if the blowback became large enough. Hey we did survey look at these results.... I wont say surveys are bad but data with a built in bias is useless, be it pro or con to any issue.I think the key point is "what's the point?". Yes, we all know that surveys can be manipulated, usually to influence public opinion. But that's not the case here, because they don't release these results to the public. So what is the point? Why spend the money conducting these surveys if the outcome is predetermined? It makes no sense.
I do think Disney cares about guest opinions and guest experience, but it's one of many things that say index again, and it's not necessarily the most important one. To say that the surveys are rigged to a pre-determined outcome is a conspiracy theory that doesn't add up - because again, it costs them money to do, and they don't release the results so there's no need to manipulate them
Now, it's certainly possible that they're biases inadvertently creep into the surveys. That would make more sense to me than some calculated decision to spend gobs of money on surveys with a predetermined outcome. But to say that Disney doesn't care at all about guest experience or does these surveys to get a predetermined answer makes absolutely zero sense and smacks of ridiculous conspiracy theory.
I don't buy the everyone at Disney is some evil Ebenezer Scrooge type sitting in their counting house trying to figure out how to swindle from the poor. I think most people they are trying to do the best job they can balancing their business to the guests but also what they perceive as their duty to shareholders. That's often a difficult balance to strike, And oftentimes it ends up tilting in the wrong direction, but I don't see any evidence that they don't care about guest experience at all, or that these surveys are just for show. It just doesn't add up.
It is ... but it's also a bit of a Catch-22 right? There's no motivation to update and support the tech, if your guests are still largely attached to the old systems.
How many times do we have to go thru this loop:
Disney introduces Fastpass and the guests hate it and want the old standby queues.
Disney introduces Fastpass+ and the guests hate it and want the old paper tickets.
Disney introduces Virtual Queues and Boarding Groups and the guests hate it and want the old Fastpass+ options.
Disney introduces Paid Fastpasses and ... ?
Umm no. Not quite but nice try. Have you stayed in a deluxe resort room? They’re deluxe category for a reason. Is it comparable to a 5 star resort in BoraBora? NO. That I can state unequivocally but the deluxe rooms at WDW compared to the value resort rooms- definitely an upgrade!
Wdw isn’t filled with nearly as many “high wealth” people as they lead to believe and…apparently you believe.
it’s what I said way upthread…it’s new money types that revel in what they’re charged and feel proud…not a luxury playground.
it was built for a middle class that sadly has changed…but it’s still built/run for them
everyone should consider that slaphead doesn’t care if he pushes it too far and attendance tanks? Why should he? He just moves on into retirement if it does and gets paid regardless.
disney isn’t run the way people assume it is…while also making excuses for price increases and trusting they won’t go too far.
which is it?
Really how many hotels even use FULL beds anymore. Almost all 4 occupant rooms are queens, Disney Deluxe is not much better than a random Courtyard Inn. In terms of room quality, I am not saying the theming of the Deluxes lobby pool areas etc are not nice, I am referring to the rooms.Only because the value hotels are so low. Disney deluxes aren’t even on par with most nice business hotels, leg alone anything “upgraded”. They are pretty damn basic by most travelers standards.
you don’t need to compare to bora bora… try a hilton in random city.
You're absolutely right about expensive hotels charging for parking. While you can say that WDW already was charging for parking, (as you know) pricing is a matter of supply and demand. Since there's a somewhat limited supply for a huge demand, their pricing for rooms is really independent of charging for parking. The premium for the room isn't for luxury as it is anywhere else - it's for access to the bubble - the closer you are to the parks the more you pay.
I disagree with your latter statement. Busch Garden and Universal both charge about the same to go through their gates but they didn't offer any free FP nor FP+. Disney was offering more than their most direct competitors in the area.
Only because the value hotels are so low. Disney deluxes aren’t even on par with most nice business hotels, leg alone anything “upgraded”. They are pretty damn basic by most travelers standards.
you don’t need to compare to bora bora… try a hilton in random city.
This thread has taken the next form of its evolution: The airing of unrelated grievances.
Hey I know a club you can join…No, I remember the question I was asked: would I be willing to pay more for access to select rides if there were no crowds, guaranteed.
You cannot be serious. Rides generate NO money? Take the rides out of the park. HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE GOING TO DISNEY WORLD?
No. You had the privilege of being able to make 3 Fastpasses in advance. That's it. They were free and not skip the line passes either.
Essentially Disney was doing you a favor.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.