pdude81
Well-Known Member
Last edited:
Initially the dining plan was a discount deal. I priced it out carefully in 2005 and 2006. Originally, the DDP included appetizers and gratuity. Even if you didn't order all the food/drinks, as long as you ate/bought a TS entrée/buffet, a QS meal, and a snack for each day; you came out with a substantial discount.I applaud you for finding an example…
..:I double dog dare you to find another?
Probably, but I actually changed quite a few FP on the day I planned to use them. FP+ changed over time. Initially, there was very little flexibility, but the system became more flexible over time.
(With the tiering in Epcot, IMO, it didn't matter a ton which attractions you picked, especially for your tier 2 attractions. Very often the standby and FP lines were nearly identical, and modifying was easy. It took all of about 15 seconds.)
Your point is taken but this doesn't account for the changing ways people spend money or some of the massive upgrades done to the resort hotels and properties, new fireworks shows, new technologies, increasing cost of labor including live performers, etc.Well... some people don't like change. You'll still find people complaining about the loss of Mr Toad's Wild Ride.
What I'm talking about is value, which for this conversation I define as: Experiences had/money paid.
45 attractions for $400 is a better value than 30 attractions for $400
Similarly, 45 attractions for $400 is a better value than 45 attractions for $600
Higher ticket prices (including paid FP), reduced hours (including closing MK for a ticketed event) and longer wait times all equal less value for your vacation. You have to pay more to have the same experiences (or maybe fewer experiences)
Hmmm…ETA on that?
That's really just legacy FP on your phone. WDW probably has too few attractions to make it work as well as it did in DLR, which is why it went in the FP+ direction in the first place. Different guest-mix (far more AP-heavy in CA) between WDW and DLR too.I realize I'm late to asking this... and this thread has gone off the rails... but anyone mind explaining why MaxPass wouldn't work? I understand DLR is a much shorter vacation length, but what else am I missing? Thanks in advance... (and pretty please don't make me feel like an idiot ) thank you
Sure, But I dont see how Disney is going to try and keep 36,000 hotel rooms full by running guests off every 3-4 days. I still think they want people there as long as possible. Of course I could be completely wrong. Wouldn't be the 1st time.Did you notice your hotel room doesn't get cheaper the longer you stay? The ticket discounting is the lure... the hotel, food&beverage is the lioness hiding and ready to take you down.
Housekeeping costs aren't even a factor here... That's something they do in volume all the time anyway. That would be chasing pennies while dollars fly over your head.
…hopefully in MayMy guess is when the new version of FastPass is ready to go, so will the Genie. I imagine it will all launch as one integrated system.
I would think it could work but I think this plan maximizes profits.I realize I'm late to asking this... and this thread has gone off the rails... but anyone mind explaining why MaxPass wouldn't work? I understand DLR is a much shorter vacation length, but what else am I missing? Thanks in advance... (and pretty please don't make me feel like an idiot ) thank you
I totally agree with you that it isn't filled with high wealth people. Most are staunchly middle class, but that doesn't mean they won't spend money like they have more than they actually do at Disney parks - especially for their little ones. Where I believe Disney is most vulnerable to price shocks is outside the parks - resorts and DS. A family planning to use Premier Access might feel less-inclined to stay on property.Wdw isn’t filled with nearly as many “high wealth” people as they lead to believe and…apparently you believe.
it’s what I said way upthread…it’s new money types that revel in what they’re charged and feel proud…not a luxury playground.
it was built for a middle class that sadly has changed…but it’s still built/run for them
everyone should consider that slaphead doesn’t care if he pushes it too far and attendance tanks? Why should he? He just moves on into retirement if it does and gets paid regardless.
disney isn’t run the way people assume it is…while also making excuses for price increases and trusting they won’t go too far.
which is it?
Maxpass doesn't work because it was ten dollars total per ticket and you could still get paper for free if you didn't want to pay, meaning that change wouldn't generate sufficient revenue for WDW to implement.I realize I'm late to asking this... and this thread has gone off the rails... but anyone mind explaining why MaxPass wouldn't work? I understand DLR is a much shorter vacation length, but what else am I missing? Thanks in advance... (and pretty please don't make me feel like an idiot ) thank you
Maxpass probably wouldn’t work because it’s not that used in California…but would be gobbled up in Orlando and overrun the parks.I realize I'm late to asking this... and this thread has gone off the rails... but anyone mind explaining why MaxPass wouldn't work? I understand DLR is a much shorter vacation length, but what else am I missing? Thanks in advance... (and pretty please don't make me feel like an idiot ) thank you
I could see that causing an issue. Thank youThat's really just legacy FP on your phone. WDW probably has too few attractions to make it work as well as it did in DLR, which is why it went in the FP+ direction in the first place. Different guest-mix (far more AP-heavy in CA) between WDW and DLR too.
Thank you for the response.I would think it could work but I think this plan maximizes profits.
That makes a lot of sense, thank you!Maxpass doesn't work because it was ten dollars total per ticket and you could still get paper for free if you didn't want to pay, meaning that change wouldn't generate sufficient revenue for WDW to implement.
And in DLR a good chunk of people refused to pay the $10 as there are a lot more things to do there if you don't have passes. . In WDW you'd have people screaming that they only got 2 passes for their 10 bucks and they wanted their money back. So by charging per attraction, more money is made and pricing can be set per attraction instead of per person.
if this is their plan their are dumber than I thought. While I understand those in queues aren’t spending money, if that make ways for more to be outside of queues shopping and dinning, we’ll dining places already stay full and how many more can you fit into the emporium? They want us to pay for a fastpass to get in there too?"...moving guests out of queues and into the park frees up time for them to shop and dine - all important factors for boosting Disney's earnings per guest."(SHOWING JUST HOW GREEDY DISNEY HAS BECOME!!!!)
Very good point! I didn't realize it wasn't being used much in Cali. Thank youMaxpass probably wouldn’t work because it’s not that used in California…but would be gobbled up in Orlando and overrun the parks.
it would have to be priced high where they may not sell…but not low where everyone gets it. Hard line to walk.
also…every market study shows micro transactions yield more profit.
The original system is still the best. You just stand in line and wait your turn.How many times do we have to go thru this loop:
Disney introduces Fastpass and the guests hate it and want the old standby queues.
Disney introduces Fastpass+ and the guests hate it and want the old paper tickets.
Disney introduces Virtual Queues and Boarding Groups and the guests hate it and want the old Fastpass+ options.
Disney introduces Paid Fastpasses and ... ?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.