Californian Elitist
Well-Known Member
I love how the writer mentioned scenes from our favorite "films" and referred to Tangled as "Rapunzel."
Looking forward to more news.
Looking forward to more news.
Last edited:
-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
Fantasmic! 2.0 Rumors, Speculation, Announcments
- Thread starter Nland316
- Start date
Figments Friend
Well-Known Member
Breathing a slight sigh of relief , as there was no mention of 'Frozen' being included.
Fingers crossed it stays that way.
There is enough exposure of that element elsewhere in the Parks.
Maybe this is just because the writer of the article does not consider it one of 'our favorite movies'...?
Good call.
-
Fingers crossed it stays that way.
There is enough exposure of that element elsewhere in the Parks.
Maybe this is just because the writer of the article does not consider it one of 'our favorite movies'...?
Good call.
-
brb1006
Well-Known Member
I hope the new Fantasmic gains a moving Mickey head.Breathing a slight sigh of relief , as there was no mention of 'Frozen' being included.
Fingers crossed it stays that way.
There is enough exposure of that element elsewhere in the Parks.
Maybe this is just because the writer of the article does not consider it one of 'our favorite movies'...?
Good call.
-
Figments Friend
Well-Known Member
I would say that is pretty much a given at this point.
Most staged productions in the Parks now have the newer 'look' with animated features.
The exception being Disneyland's 'Mickey & the Magical Map'.
It is the only place where you can still see 'old' Mickey.
They cannot change the character to his 'new look' due to the video element effects used throughout the Show.
The 'old' version performing on stage has to match the 'old' version used in the video elements.
All new video elements showing the 'new' Mickey would have to be done and added to the production for a 'new' Mickey to appear onstage.
That has yet to happen...if ever at this point....with this Show.
'Fantasmic!!' will not have that problem, as the new show will be a completely refreshed production with 'current' Mickey.
-
Maybe they forgot an opening date? Any one know how's Fantasmic(IDK whether to use 2 ! or not! )doing?
brb1006
Well-Known Member
With new lines by the current voice of Mickey.
Emmanuel
Well-Known Member
It just popped back up on the site without a reopening date so I don't know what was with the temporary removal
TP2000
Well-Known Member
What a joke. Even I knew that movie, er... "film" as they call it, was called Tangled.
The author of that article, Nicole Nalty - a "Content Producer" for Disney and graduate of the University of San Francisco with a BA in Communications of all things https://www.linkedin.com/in/nicolenalty/ finally went back and corrected her mistake. I'm sure she got some emails.
GiveMeTheMusic
Well-Known Member
What a joke. Even I knew that movie, er... "film" as they call it, was called Tangled.
The author of that article, Nicole Nalty - a "Content Producer" for Disney and graduate of the University of San Francisco with a BA in Communications of all things https://www.linkedin.com/in/nicolenalty/ finally went back and corrected her mistake. I'm sure she got some emails.
LOL - @TP2000 will find you!
TP2000
Well-Known Member
Hee hee!
I admit, I am in a saucy mood today...But if the precious little darling is going to put her byline on a public article and not expect to be called out on a bonehead mistake like calling the "film" Rapunzel instead of Tangled, then she shouldn't broadcast her career to the world on a Linkedin profile (she's also on Twitter and other Social Media, purposely letting the world see where she is, what she does with her time each day, and how she thinks). If Nicole Nalty doesn't want the world to know her and her mistakes, she should use a nom de plume for her public articles different from her multiple unlocked Social Media accounts.
And yes, eons ago in the last century I was on the high school newspaper. We used rubber cement to literally paste together each issue on a giant plywood easel back then. And my high school journalism teacher had very strict rules on using the AP Style Guide and double-checking your sources and triple-checking the nomenclature, punctuation and spelling of any title, place name or proper name.
I have no idea what a young student like Miss Nalty at the University of San Francisco circa 2012 is taught in a "Communications" course of work (Communications with what, or whom? And how?), but apparently double-checking titles and names is not one of the skills taught.
Last edited:
Californian Elitist
Well-Known Member
What a joke. Even I knew that movie, er... "film" as they call it, was called Tangled.
The author of that article, Nicole Nalty - a "Content Producer" for Disney and graduate of the University of San Francisco with a BA in Communications of all things https://www.linkedin.com/in/nicolenalty/ finally went back and corrected her mistake. I'm sure she got some emails.
I adore you, TP. Looking up her Linkedin and everything... Love it!
All writers, publishers, etc. must always go back and revise, revise, revise. Then again, it's possible she thought "Rapunzel" was the actual name of the film, since a lot of Disney movies are named after their protagonists. If that was the case, that was bad research on her part.
Curious Constance
Well-Known Member
TP2000
Well-Known Member
It took me 10 seconds to Google her and find her multiple accounts. It helps that Nalty is a unique surname. It took me 30 seconds to scan her LinkedIn profile, and then it was over. She simply made a mistake that shouldn't have been made by someone paid by the Walt Disney Company to communicate to their customers, and in this case, big fans of the product.
But it was her very recent Bachelors degree in "Communications" from some university that likely thinks very, very highly of itself and its faculty and its expensive, bloated programs that got me going on this one. What a joke.
Oh, she'll survive. She's got all the right credentials and 2010's attitude, so she'll likely thrive in fact.
I imagine the entire business model of the D23 blog like this is to not have editors or supervision of any kind. And that's not her fault. Her boss has probably made the same silly mistakes before, and she likely gets a gold star for correcting it within 12 hours of originally publishing it. Miss Nalty and her boss are right now heading out early to grab a Starbucks down in the lobby and patting each other on the back on another successful day of "Communication" with the general public.
In related and happier news, I should mention how excited I am that Tangled will be part of the new Fantasmic!!.
If they can replicate, or even just reference, this waterborne scene and this lovely song during the show I think the audience will really respond well to it!
Last edited:
Animaniac93-98
Well-Known Member
Don't be too hard on Ms. Nalty, perhaps she's just a disgrunteld Disney fan who's still annoyed at the last minute title change the company made to the movie before its release:
Or maybe she knows it's still called "Rapunzel' in other countries?
Or maybe she knows it's still called "Rapunzel' in other countries?
