metalaero
New Member
I'm a real Dan or and I cant stress this enough I am Dan Cockrell. Either way this is fun!it's quite obvious the real dan (if that was his name) was likely neutralized and replaced when you 'stepped away' and 'came back'
I'm a real Dan or and I cant stress this enough I am Dan Cockrell. Either way this is fun!it's quite obvious the real dan (if that was his name) was likely neutralized and replaced when you 'stepped away' and 'came back'
Well there are stylometry tools available to determine similarities...If anything, the article and (everyone's) reaction to it and obsession over it has diverted a lot of attention and energy from discussion of SWGE and its merits/shortcomings. Just as AP previews were kicking off for the land at WDW.
I was told unsolicited that opinion pieces I wrote angered Imagineers and Executives. Understanding that's only anecdotal, I am operating under the assumption that people with more cache than myself have put out stuff that has upset people far more than my criticizing Next Gen and Epcot's direction.Is it being read and seriously considered or just for amusement?
I do wonder what various execs/WDI'ers were like when Pixar Pier was "completed". I'm sure they weren't happy with opinions of it but they need to realize when you work for one of largest, most powerful companies out there, your work will be judged because everyone expects the best.I was told unsolicited that opinion pieces I wrote angered Imagineers and Executives. Understanding that's only anecdotal, I am operating under the assumption that people with more cache than myself have put out stuff that has upset people far more than my criticizing Next Gen and Epcot's direction.
I also think it's a function of not being able to steer the message which cannot be dismissed. @WDW1974 would regularly put it out there that Disney would allow their "paid schills" to badmouth select projects as a means of maintaining optics.
The majority of older members in my group are horrified.I do wonder what various execs/WDI'ers were like when Pixar Pier was "completed". I'm sure they weren't happy with opinions of it but they need to realize when you work for one of largest, most powerful companies out there, your work will be judged because everyone expects the best.
I get they're only doing what upper management wants but the point still stands, they will be judged regardless of who is telling them to do it.
I'm sure they wouldn't be happy to hear what my friends and even friends parents are saying about the impending Epcot overhaul. And that's only telling them what's been 100% confirmed by the company too.
Pixar Pier also had a built in scapegoat (Lasseter).I do wonder what various execs/WDI'ers were like when Pixar Pier was "completed". I'm sure they weren't happy with opinions of it but they need to realize when you work for one of largest, most powerful companies out there, your work will be judged because everyone expects the best.
I get they're only doing what upper management wants but the point still stands, they will be judged regardless of who is telling them to do it.
I'm sure they wouldn't be happy to hear what my friends and even friends parents are saying about the impending Epcot overhaul. And that's only telling them what's been 100% confirmed by the company too.
And I'll assume Tom Fitzgerald will be Epcots? Genuinely asking.Pixar Pier also had a built in scapegoat (Lasseter).
As it stands now, yes. But that would also be assuming Scott Trowbridge is to blame for Star Wars when the reality is both are probably doing what they're told by Chapek and other execs.And I'll assume Tom Fitzgerald will be Epcots? Genuinely asking.
also calling into question the association between the.dreamfinder and spirit.
From the Twitter account I found earlier that lined up with a lot here:So @the.dreamfinder breaks the story.
Then makes multiple posts that Gary Snyder is a legit source.
Then links one crappy little site that tweets out the story.
Then gets called out by name.
Then disappears and doesn't even make a post even though he's reading this thread.
Makes perfect sense,Garythe.dreamfinder
I have a serious suspicion as well. The way he phrased this post is just way too '74-ish. That said, I don't think it's Michael/74. Rather, I think it might be Gary.So @the.dreamfinder breaks the story.
Then makes multiple posts that Gary Snyder is a legit source.
Then links one crappy little site that tweets out the story.
Then gets called out by name.
Then disappears and doesn't even make a post even though he's been reading this thread multiple times since the outing.
Makes perfect sense,@the.dreamfinderGary/Mike
Happy Sunday everyone! Just in time for Sunday brunch, a shocking new column from Gary Snyder about the Walt Disney Company. Get your bagels and cream cheese, pick up the freshest seasonal fruits from the farmers market and settle in for a helluva read.
“Al”, you might want a tall, hot mug of black coffee instead.
Full text here, because Gary’s column have a tendency to disappear. Couldn’t imagine why!
Here's one of my favorite Disney plants...I'm just waiting for someone to make a satirical article naming out various other members on this website as Disney plants. Someone ping me when its out, because I need a good laugh after all of this.
I mean, is this news? We all know how Disney likes to use plants to cover things up...Here's one of my favorite Disney plants...
Besides the reply in their chat section, I doubt it.Is Micechat going to comment on this. I frequent and enjoy both sites to be honest. I'm looking forward to seeing how this all plays out. Definitely in the meantime I have to say I am unsure who to trust on any messageboard.
That’s not how Disney sees their product. It’s all about BRANDING and BRAND interaction touchpoints (eeewww!! ). They’ll do stuff like adults only AbD groups, but they don’t see it as a market that isn’t being well served under the current business model.
Disney would get more money for BlueSky if all of its IPs came with it.
Viacom would be a perfect fit and it could be integrated into Nickelodeon instead of the sh-tshow known as Paramount Animation.
The system is the problem, not any one particular actor below Iger/Mucha. Things won't be any different if Chapek is terminated so he can "spend more time with the family" and replaced by the press savvy Cathy Powell, another executive with ZERO substantive parks experience/background. (To put things in perspective, the last head of Parks and Resorts with any meaningful experience was Jay "I hate theme parks" Rasulo and that was almost TEN years ago)
Definitely not a fan of the drama. I may have to take a break from both boards. Hopefully it can all be cleared up. My fear is that nothing gets cleared up and then the community is compromised as a result of fear and people not knowing who is corporate vs legitimate.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.