Disney would be insanely out of touch to do that. Both with what Animal Kingdom needs & what fans want from Encanto.This cannot be understated: If Encanto is anything less than a family friendly D-ticket attraction, Disney has missed the mark on this overhaul. The park needs a family friendly ride on that spot.
I think you mean 1 good dinosaur movieTo be fair, Universal only made like 2 or 3 good dinosaur films with the JP franchise
I wonder at times if Disney looks at long dark rides as a risk financially. Let’s face it; today’s younger generations have the attention span of a gnat on crack. I would bet they see financing several 100 million dollars on a dark ride to be a waste of funds when over half the riders just bury their faces in their phones 2 minutes into the ride. And with Genie+ I feel that Disney makes this situation worse. When my wife and I are hitting the rides and have paid for Genie+, we are on our phones looking for more rides when in queues or even on rides (I hate to admit).The park definitely needs a good dark ride.
Totally agree with you but I would like to think that Disney would want to do things different to the current social norm. Not fall into the trap that everything needs to be done on the phone or a coaster that lasts less than 90 seconds but we’re dealing with Iger right nowI wonder at times if Disney looks at long dark rides as a risk financially. Let’s face it; today’s younger generations have the attention span of a gnat on crack. I would bet they see financing several 100 million dollars on a dark ride to be a waste of funds when over half the riders just bury their faces in their phones 2 minutes into the ride. And with Genie+ I feel that Disney makes this situation worse. When my wife and I are hitting the rides and have paid for Genie+, we are on our phones looking for more rides when in queues or even on rides (I hate to admit).
They probably do. I hope not, though, because not everybody likes thrill rides. Disney World needs more tame attractions.I wonder at times if Disney looks at long dark rides as a risk financially.
JP was an all time great. Jurassic World was a very serviceable and entertaining popcorn flick.I think you mean 1 good dinosaur movie
My argument exactly.Not sure why people would want to put Encanto or Indiana Jones in Animal Kingdom when these movies have little to no animal representation.
Nope, no animals in it AT ALL! Not a one...Can't see any in this shot..Not sure why people would want to put Encanto or Indiana Jones in Animal Kingdom when these movies have little to no animal representation.
Not sure why people would want to put Encanto or Indiana Jones in Animal Kingdom when these movies have little to no animal representation.
No idea, you just said Indy had nothing to do with animals, and I just wanted to point out your mistake.
Of course, you also seem to be forgetting the episode of The Young Adventures of Indiana Jones when as a child he traveled to Africa and met President Theodore Roosevelt on safari. Then, after discovering where a very rare species of antelope, the Oryx, and witnessing the safari group killing a massive number of the rare animals he himself helped locate, Indiana helped open the eyes of Roosevelt and company to the preservation of the animals being alive and how they affected the balance of life in the area. Thus, teaching the viewers how over-hunting a species can lead to its extinction and the fallout that can have on a location's ecosystem.
But yeah, I guess that little bit of conservation of animals has absolutely nothing to do with the conservation of animals.
View attachment 742492
Nope, no animals in it AT ALL! Not a one...Can't see any in this shot..
So by that logic, does Aladdin belong in Animal Kingdom since there are animals in that movie?
I wonder at times if Disney looks at long dark rides as a risk financially. Let’s face it; today’s younger generations have the attention span of a gnat on crack. I would bet they see financing several 100 million dollars on a dark ride to be a waste of funds when over half the riders just bury their faces in their phones 2 minutes into the ride. And with Genie+ I feel that Disney makes this situation worse. When my wife and I are hitting the rides and have paid for Genie+, we are on our phones looking for more rides when in queues or even on rides (I hate to admit).
Not sure why people would want to put Encanto or Indiana Jones in Animal Kingdom when these movies have little to no animal representation.
Indeed. These are indirect, contrived, retro-fitting excuses, not reasons, as has happened with EPCOT.So by that logic, does Aladdin belong in Animal Kingdom since there are animals in that movie?
Yes, I think most of us are just relieved at dodging the Zootopia bullet rather than seeing Encanto as an ideal fit for AK.I don't think many people are saying these are the best IP to use in AK, more that they are better than Zootopia and at least are angles to make it work. The parks theme is more about conservation and coexisting with nature than just animals
But you have Antonio and how he communicates with animals and he room was a forest/jungle with animals. For Indy you can do about exploring South American/equatorial areas (and hopefully showing how artifacts should stay where they are from rather than in a museum) and obviously can have exhibits with snakes
Not sure why people would want to put Encanto or Indiana Jones in Animal Kingdom when these movies have little to no animal representation.
In fairness though, Antonio is easily the least popular of all of the Madrigal kids, and even some of the adults are more popular.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.