News 'Encanto' and 'Indiana Jones'-themed experiences at Animal Kingdom

JackCH

JackCH

Well-Known Member
MisterPenguin said:
The latter. Because they tried and failed. After two dinosaur movies and a Dinoland that was not lovingly embraced, it was time to call it quits.

Especially, since Universal did make successful dino movies. If Disney tried *another* dino movie, they'd be called out for for just following Uni. And imagine if that movie failed... yikes.

This was a time when Disney failed with regard to a specific genre. Uni wins on dinos. Disney wins on princesses. You play the hand you have.

And if you want Disney to double down on dinos in the parks without a merchandising theatrical tie-in... well... that's not going to happen. There are plenty of successful movies that suffice for park tie-ins and merchandising and franchising without using dinos.
Click to expand...
They were never going to be able to out "Jurassic Park" Jurassic Park.
 
S

Sorcerer Mickey

Well-Known Member
MisterPenguin said:
And if you want Disney to double down on dinos in the parks without a merchandising theatrical tie-in... well... that's not going to happen. There are plenty of successful movies that suffice for park tie-ins and merchandising and franchising without using dinos.
Click to expand...
Good thing Dinosaur is being replaced by a franchise with a recent successful movie.
 
wdwmagic

wdwmagic

Administrator
Moderator
Premium Member
Original Poster

New ECO-RYTHMICS Show Brings Recycled Beats to Disney's Animal Kingdom​

www.wdwmagic.com

New ECO-RYTHMICS Show Brings Recycled Beats to Disney's Animal Kingdom

New ECO-RYTHMICS Show Brings Recycled Beats to Disney's Animal Kingdom
www.wdwmagic.com www.wdwmagic.com

ECO-RYTHMICS_Full_58927.jpg
 
DavidDL

DavidDL

Well-Known Member
MisterPenguin said:
... And if you want Disney to double down on dinos in the parks without a merchandising theatrical tie-in... well... that's not going to happen. There are plenty of successful movies that suffice for park tie-ins and merchandising and franchising without using dinos.
Click to expand...

Right? Mickey forbid they give Dinoland a general "plus-ing" or come up with new, "IP-less" attractions featuring dinosaurs that keep the identity/mission statement of the park in tact. Why on Earth would they want to go that route? Obviously it's impossible for lands or attractions to be profitable without a feature film to base them off of.

If only there were attractions somewhere in Disney's catalog that proved otherwise. If only there were some original attractions that had withstood the test of time and proved popular/profitable enough to become "IP" in their own right and retain dedicated fanbases.

If only Disney still wanted to prove they could do things better than the competition by offering a dinosaur themed land that everyone could enjoy, where not all the attractions are thrill rides that come with height requirements or some rule that adults can't ride without a child. That'd be like, the "Disney difference", or something.

Gosh, if only. :rolleyes:
 
MisterPenguin

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
DavidDL said:
Right? Mickey forbid they give Dinoland a general "plus-ing" or come up with new, "IP-less" attractions featuring dinosaurs that keep the identity/mission statement of the park in tact. Why on Earth would they want to go that route? Obviously it's impossible for lands or attractions to be profitable without a feature film to base them off of.

If only there were attractions somewhere in Disney's catalog that proved otherwise. If only there were some original attractions that had withstood the test of time and proved popular/profitable enough to become "IP" in their own right and retain dedicated fanbases.

If only Disney still wanted to prove they could do things better than the competition by offering a dinosaur themed land that everyone could enjoy, where not all the attractions are thrill rides that come with height requirements or some rule that adults can't ride without a child. That'd be like, the "Disney difference", or something.

Gosh, if only. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
I could see one wanting a dino experience at a theme park.

I can't see the lack of a dino experience as a failure.

Plenty of great parks don't have a dino experience.

There's no rule that a park has to have one to be considered good.
 
lazyboy97o

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
MisterPenguin said:
I could see one wanting a dino experience at a theme park.

I can't see the lack of a dino experience as a failure.

Plenty of great parks don't have a dino experience.

There's no rule that a park has to have one to be considered good.
Click to expand...
The question isn’t about any park. It’s one specifically about animals, and not just living real animals. Past, present and imagined. Such an important concept that it was built into the entrance of the park.
 
G

Garyjames220

New Member
HauntedPirate said:
I've gotten in line when it's said 45 and 60 minutes and it's been 20, last September was my most recent ride.

You also went during what has become a rather busy time of year. Was it an actual 90 minute wait or was that just what you saw as you walked by? Curious, not accusing.
Click to expand...
I never waited in it at 90

i waited at 60 mins and it took 55 mins

i was actually very surprised as I thought the start of December was meant to be quieter
 
The Leader of the Club

The Leader of the Club

Well-Known Member
lazyboy97o said:
The question isn’t about any park. It’s one specifically about animals, and not just living real animals. Past, present and imagined. Such an important concept that it was built into the entrance of the park.
Click to expand...
Keep in mind the “imagined” animals had virtually no presence for the first decade of the park’s existence and really only came with the addition of Pandora (which is tenuous at best).
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom