News 'Encanto' and 'Indiana Jones'-themed experiences at Animal Kingdom

Architectural Guinea Pig

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
E/D Tickets are really more dependent on the park's existing offerings. Ratatouille in WDSP is an E-ticket and a headliner for the park, Ratatouille in Epcot is more of a chill D-ticket in the back of the land. Applying that logic to AK it would make sense for Encanto to be a D like NRJ, with Everest, FoP, and Indy being "the" headliners for the park. It seems to also hold the same NRJ quality, with it being a more beautiful and calm ride without a ton of showstopping wow moments.
 

Starship824

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
What is considered an E-ticket attraction doesn't matter since the ticketing system hasn't existed for 40 years and people who try to classify what ticket a ride is, is just guessing since we'll never know unless they bring back that system which will never happen. The best comparison we have is LL tiers and LL SP and if we go by that than there aren't really that many "E-tickets" and FoP would be one of them.
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
What is considered an E-ticket attraction doesn't matter since the ticketing system hasn't existed for 40 years and people who try to classify what ticket a ride is, is just guessing since we'll never know unless they bring back that system which will never happen. The best comparison we have is LL tiers and LL SP and if we go by that than there aren't really that many "E-tickets" and FoP would be one of them.

People are still attracted to go to parks. That is why they are called attractions.

There is still a level of draw. The term is around like many terms we still use for thing that themselves have changed.

You can charge more for a day at a park full of them then a park with little of them.

Supply and Demand, different phrasing and specific to attraction venues.


Even without physical individual tickets, and with and without we have turnstiles both physical clicks and digital. Why we still call them clicks. The business of it did not get smaller, it got bigger with more variables.

If it is getting people into the park and ridership unique and repeat are highest in the park, you have a modern E ticket.
And it can be more fluid then ever.
 
Last edited:

ToTBellHop

Well-Known Member
LL cost is a good indicator. F ticket is funny but E being the most desirable attractions can't really go beyond that. Extra credit for the industry I guess.
Obviously Rise prints money. Very high capacity and the most expensive LLs. Bob is surely very pleased with its success even with broken cannons.
 

Marc Davis Fan

Well-Known Member
My best judgment about today's E ticket categorization, extrapolating from what's widely agreed to an E ticket, is that it's a combination of:
  1. Scale
  2. (High-Quality) Detail
The attractions that pretty much everyone agrees to be an E ticket have both of those: Haunted Mansion, Splash Mountain, Big Thunder, Tower of Terror, Expedition Everest, etc.

Attractions seem to be viewed as D tickets when they lack one of those two, for instance:
  • Mine Train and Na'vi River Journey are beautifully detailed, but too small/short to be considered E tickets.
  • "it's a small world" is actually a massive-scale attraction, but the sets are too simple to make it an E ticket (despite it being rightly beloved, of course, and indeed being one of my own favorite attractions).
Of course, caveats include:
  • When something was vastly larger scale than most attractions at the time it was built (factor 1), that might outweigh its relative lack of high-quality detail (factor 2), which would be why "it's a small world" and Jungle Cruise used to be viewed as E tickets.
  • A unique/novel characteristic might for a time push something to E ticket status whose lack of scale and/or high-quality detail would otherwise relegate it to below E ticket status, e.g., Soarin' (which, as flying theaters become more common, may eventually be relegated to D ticket status).
  • Attractions with a high level of thrill and/or iconic placement might be viewed as having E ticket status, at least for a time, despite lacking in some of these other factors.
In all, I'd suggest that the E ticket concept remains useful, so long as it's understand as a family resemblance category that allows for disagreement about the categorization of some attractions.

With all that being said, I hope Encanto contains both the level of scale and the level of high-quality detail that I'd suggest would make it an E ticket for all...
 

Blobbles

Well-Known Member
AND lieutenant Beck to Admiral Ackbar?? When the Star Destroyer captures you... "It's a Trap!"

I mean.. come on people.
SWGE’s big flaw in hindsight was the sequel trilogy use. I know at the time of design and announcement it hadn’t crashed and burned yet, but in hindsight it would’ve been more well received as the OT.
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
My best judgment about today's E ticket categorization, extrapolating from what's widely agreed to an E ticket, is that it's a combination of:
  1. Scale
  2. (High-Quality) Detail
The attractions that pretty much everyone agrees to be an E ticket have both of those: Haunted Mansion, Splash Mountain, Big Thunder, Tower of Terror, Expedition Everest, etc.

Attractions seem to be viewed as D tickets when they lack one of those two, for instance:
  • Mine Train and Na'vi River Journey are beautifully detailed, but too small/short to be considered E tickets.
  • "it's a small world" is actually a massive-scale attraction, but the sets are too simple to make it an E ticket (despite it being rightly beloved, of course, and indeed being one of my own favorite attractions).
Of course, caveats include:
  • When something was vastly larger scale than most attractions at the time it was built (factor 1), that might outweigh its relative lack of high-quality detail (factor 2), which would be why "it's a small world" and Jungle Cruise used to be viewed as E tickets.
  • A unique/novel characteristic might for a time push something to E ticket status whose lack of scale and/or high-quality detail would otherwise relegate it to below E ticket status, e.g., Soarin' (which, as flying theaters become more common, may eventually be relegated to D ticket status).
  • Attractions with a high level of thrill and/or iconic placement might be viewed as having E ticket status, at least for a time, despite lacking in some of these other factors.
In all, I'd suggest that the E ticket concept remains useful, so long as it's understand as a family resemblance category that allows for disagreement about the categorization of some attractions.

With all that being said, I hope Encanto contains both the level of scale and the level of high-quality detail that I'd suggest would make it an E ticket for all...

This may be oversimplifying it in some ways and overcomplicating it in others if people don't also take into account fluidity.


20K and Hall of Presidents were once E Tickets.
Demand shifts.

Star Tours was without a doubt an E ticket its opening and just being a Simulator of that caliber was a fresh new concept and industry elevating standard in the late 80s.

20K was certainly not an E Ticket when it was about to close and popularity dwindles down but still being valuable enough to keep around for at times years until a time is right to change if ROI of operating is worthwhile.

Hall of Preidents definitely did not need its extended queue decades later and does not going near 50 years later, it is not an E ticket at all anymore but sitll.

Because by its nature, the ticket system was demand-based. Fluidity.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom