Disney Analyst
Well-Known Member
Isn’t it still due for the UK also?
Yes, July 7th.Isn’t it still due for the UK also?
That’s not Pixar’s image problem. Pixar’s image problem is that viewers look at it and say, “original animation is for streaming.” Every animation studio is facing this issue, though it’s more noticeable with Pixar because of the heights it once reached.Yes. The general public no longer looks at Pixar movies as or “I expect this to be great so I need to see it right away”
“At least we’re not WBD!” manifests againElemental beats The Flash at International box office for the second weekend ($31.3M for Elemental versus $26.6M for The Flash).
![]()
Pixar’s ‘Elemental’ Knocks Down ‘The Flash’ on International Box Office Charts
"The Flash" continues to stumble at the box office, collecting $26.6 million from 78 international territories.variety.com
The film maybe gradually gets positive word-to-mouth from the International audience, benefited from A cinemascore (similar to TLM) granted for the film.
Variety's articles on the BO don't have separate articles for separate films. So, to post an article about one film's BO, one is forced to include the other films of the day.“At least we’re not WBD!” manifests again
This makes me wonder if Blue Sky Studios was still around..How would they had dealt with this under Disney would we have even more Ice Age, Robots and Rio films until the cows come home? Even the last direct to Disney+ film on Buck Wild was unfavorable to reviews and it was not even animated by Blue Sky.That’s not Pixar’s image problem. Pixar’s image problem is that viewers look at it and say, “original animation is for streaming.” Every animation studio is facing this issue, though it’s more noticeable with Pixar because of the heights it once reached.
3. They are said to have good working conditions for their production teams.As far as the ballooning budget:
1. Being used to making huge BO receipts, the animation studios probably don't think about tightening their belts.
2. I would assume all the engineering work to advance the art of CGI is baked into the budget. Other studios can rely on using what's just state-of-the-art off-the-shelf CGI without spending tens of millions for engineering new water/ice/fire/hair/skin simulation.
This makes me wonder if Blue Sky Studios was still around..How would they had dealt with this under Disney would we have even more Ice Age, Robots and Rio films until the cows come home? Even the last direct to Disney+ film on Buck Wild was unfavorable to reviews and it was not even animated by Blue Sky.
Yeah, they were going the Disney direct-to-video route from the late 90's with their sequels. Look at Rio 2.
Look at that, they all made money! 3 and 4 made the most money!
As for #2, none of the major studios are using stock off-the-shelf stuff. Most (including Disney/Pixar) are using industry standard modeling and composite software like Maya and Nuke, among others, which offer APIs for deep levels or custom coding and they all have their own in-house render systems.As far as the ballooning budget:
1. Being used to making huge BO receipts, the animation studios probably don't think about tightening their belts.
2. I would assume all the engineering work to advance the art of CGI is baked into the budget. Other studios can rely on using what's just state-of-the-art off-the-shelf CGI without spending tens of millions for engineering new water/ice/fire/hair/skin simulation.
There's a reason we call things "vanilla" to say they're bland or boring... and yet vanilla is one of the most popular flavors on earth.Look at that, they all made money! 3 and 4 made the most money!
5 had a noticeable drop in profit thanks to it not being liked in and of itself and because 3 & 4 weren't liked.Look at that, they all made money! 3 and 4 made the most money!
3 and 4 made the most money.5 had a noticeable drop in profit thanks to it not being liked in and of itself and because 3 & 4 weren't liked.
Compared to DAS, Pixar has always been the sequel machine with about one third of its movies being sequels.And yet! Pixar is about to become the sequel machine.
Toy Story 3 & 4 were billion dollar films and both made more than 1 & 2.3 and 4 made the most money.
Too bad this does not work for Disney.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.