Tony Perkis
Well-Known Member
I was agreeing with Disney that removing some may make sense but with you that removing all of the was a mistake. Maybe if I had had more sleep I would have been more clear. I thought it was fairly obvious since my first sentence said I agreed with you in the first sentence.
Your viewpoint is conflicting. You agree with me, but also agree with Disney using a vague caveat of “it may make sense to remove some”.
If a film was previously available for singular event licensing to theatres, what specific circumstance makes sense for Disney to revoke it? Monetarily? Morally?
The ability to watch Nakatomi Tower blow up on Christmas Eve has no bearing on whether someone will purchase Hulu or Disney+.
This is pure greed on Disney’s part, and it further hurts the long term viability of the theatre experience.
Last edited: