nerdboyrockstar
Well-Known Member
I have not seen ANY materials from Universal touting it as its own theme park. The closest they've gotten is calling it a "theme park within a theme park," which apparently can confuse the hell out of people.
Disney is not a reactionary company in the Theme Park business... they are the trend-setter in the business. Regardless of if HP is wildly successful, Disney does not want to lose this perception that the general public has of it (I am not talking about fanatics like us who know more than the average public either) and to propose something new that is obviously supposed to outdo HP I think would send a signal that the company is worried that its position is faltering.
Disney has been reactionary for years. Just look at MGM and AK. Both were reactionary, especially MGM. I really wish Disney was still the trend-setter they use to be. They have been matched and surpassed on certain fronts by both Universal and Las Vegas. This is what so many of us are trying to say. In the eyes of the general public their position is faltering. It's getting much more difficult to impress today’s audience. They need to keep pushing the boundaries of themed entertainment, not to simply rely on their cash cow characters.
We need a POTC for the 21st century.
See? Now you've lost all credibility!
Icebergs float. Glaciers carve out valleys. :lookaroun
Sorry, everybody else in this thread seems to be arguing over something ludicrous, Figured I didn't want to be left out! :lol:
The average guest doesn't have expectations as to what an expansion is or what it will include!
We are the only ones with expectations and some of us have already made up our mind on the FLE when we haven't even laid eyes on it yet!
I see it for what it is. A new ride (great), new and better themed M&Gs for the princesses (anything is better than the tent in TT), a new restaurant (I thought everyone would be happy about that - we're always complaining about the lack of), added capacity for Dumbo (bonus). Nothing about this expansion disappoints me... that's b/c I have no expectations for an expansion... I'm looking at the additions for what they are.
I think the word expansion invokes some wonderful elaborate plans in the minds of fanboys that we're already disappointed. If Disney announced they were adding a new ride and retheming the M&Gs... I don't think we'd hear near the noise we're hearing on this one!
IMO! :wave:
Two words Disney... Beastly Kingdom
Not while The Lost Continent at IoA is still around.
Not while The Lost Continent at IoA is still around.
Not while The Lost Continent at IoA is still around.
Not while The Lost Continent at IoA is still around.
Well it almost is gone and if the rumors are true after phase 2 of Harry Potter it will be completely gone.
There may be rumors of a "Phase 2" but they are not true. The rest of Lost Continent is not going to potter. There is plenty of Potter. If you fill half a park with one property you shoot yourself in the foot.
Two words Disney... Beastly Kingdom
The TMZ thing I can't really pin on UNI, though.
Not WDW. TDL/DisneySea, yes. WDW has not been the trend-setter in a long time. DLR is above WDW right now.
EDIT: I'd even put UNI above WDW on trend-setting, right now.
Following up on this, just like MGM was a reaction to Universal Orlando and AK was a reaction to Busch Gardens Tampa ...
Pleasure Island was a reaction to Church Street Station
and
DCA was a reaction to the other tourist traps in SoCal (Universal, Santa Monica Pier, National Parks, Miramar/San Diego, Cannery Row)
and
The last big idea they floated - Disney's Night Kingdom - was a reaction to Discovery Cove.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.