At most I could see the remaining 1/3, to the north and south of the DL hotel, being actual theme park expansion, and even that I suspect will see a couple hotels along the edges, why waste land on a berm when you could use that space for a hotel and block the outside world that way?
My guess is 25% of the land will actually go to attractions, with the majority 75% going to hotels, shopping, and parking. I hope Disney surprises me and uses more of it for the parks but I’m not holding my breathe.
I get the sheer pessimism I guess, though maybe not so much from the lens of Disneyland. None of this really jives with what Disney has been pedalling these days. They are eager to expand their theme park space. Disneyland Resort is generally pretty tapped out. Yes DCA could better hold its weight, but it's not even a WDW experience where at any given time 2 1/2 parks are underperforming.
Even if it's just a repeat of the last Iger decade. Disneyland still expanded twice with Galaxies Edge and MMRR, so a replay still sees us reasonably expand beyond the borders. I certainly don't have visions of 7 new lands in a decade, but at the same token downplaying any semi-major theme park expansion at all with the money seems overtly pessimistic.
Then you tear down the existing hotel and boom, plenty of space to build a third park.
The Disneyland DVC Tower is deeded for 50 years. Disney cannot legally remove that tower or its immediate pool complex. I'm pretty confident the whole Disneyland Hotel complex isn't going anywhere either for another half century.
That Gene Autry Way extension, in particular, was a bizzare idea from the 1990's to create a six lane street going from the Convention Center to Angel Stadium. It was originally thought it was needed for Anaheim to host mega-events where the Convention Center and the Stadium/Honda Center sports district needed to be connected to each other. But Anaheim has never hosted an event like that, and aside from Anaheim hosting the Summer Olympics, I can't imagine what it might be.
Except Ironically D23 this summer.
$1.9 Billion. Spread across 3,500+ new hotel rooms and DVC units, plus 800,000 square feet of retail/dining/hotel amenities, and whatever is left over hopefully buys you two E Tickets and a C Ticket spinner.
Two pedestrian bridges over Disneyland Drive not included. Plus a $5 Million kickback payment to Anaheim city hall.
Lmao, but in all seriousness it would also
not include a billion dollar parking garage/Eastern Gateway project. They seem very motivated to get that done and that's partially what the Disneyland Forward is trying to hide, approval for Eastern Gateway without the opposition they ran into last time derailing it all.
As to everyone's points about spending on hotels, again this first of all isn't consistent with the last decade under Iger. They did not spend on hotels / shopping at a 3:1 ratio compared to parks and attractions. It may have actually be a 3:1 ratio in favour of parks (again ignoring the parking garage). I'm not sure why that is suddenly going to change this decade. A lot of money will still go to the parks. Less than the optimists say but also more than what you think.
The Disneyland DVC hotel is (if I generously think it is going to start averaging 33% more than it did sales wise in January) going to take
5 and a half years to sell out. I'm not saying we won't see a hotel at DLR, in fact I think we very likely will. But it likely will be just one new hotel / DVC resort and probably not even until next decade. DVC is pretty slow to sell in California historically, it won't be like WDW with a new DLR DVC needed every 2-5 years.