A1st
Well-Known Member
Too soon, it's still too soonBe happy they didn’t turn yours into a princess meet-and-greet!
Too soon, it's still too soonBe happy they didn’t turn yours into a princess meet-and-greet!
"an apple a day keeps the dentist away, dearie! heh heh heeeeeehhh!"I initially thought the apple was a giant tooth.
Be happy they didn’t turn yours into a princess meet-and-greet!
They can do whatever they want to Pinocchio as far as I'm concerned.I think this looks like an actual positive project for once.
Ya the exterior paint job kind of sucks, but exterior colour choices in Disney Parks aren't a 25 year commitment, fortunately.
I really want them to do Toad and Pinocchio.
They can do whatever they want to Pinocchio as far as I'm concerned.
I don't trust them to touch Toad. They must preserve my beloved plywood cutouts and hell ending scene!
Pixar Pier is proof of that! What a disaster.BUT optimism is not reality.
I don't trust them to touch Toad.
They actually did add a seemingly random projected mist effect in front of the shepherd and stone bridge a few years ago. I have no idea why it was put there, but it looks very good and not out of place at all.I'm too optimistic that it would all stay and just be spruced up, repainted, some projection effects. More of an Alice.
BUT optimism is not reality.
I'm sure even Disney has limits as to how severely they'll allow themselves to defile their old attractions. Mr. Toad's hell scene has been iconic since the day the park opened, and most of the little collectables based on the ride even use the miniature devils as key iconography. I can't help but feel that even the most cynical, statistics-obsessed executive would feel a little bit soulless removing the brilliant ending scene of an opening day attraction thought up by the original Imagineers and replacing it with some inoffensive, vapid garbage just because the scene could possibly scare a few literal toddlers here and there. There isn't even anything "politically incorrect" about Toad's hell scene either; it's a tongue-in-cheek pastiche of the Christian hell. There isn't a single offensive thing about it.I still fully expect them to change Mr. Toad's ending, or get rid of it entirely, at some point. What with them being on a PC kick and everything.
You never know. You just never know.I'm sure even Disney has limits as to how severely they'll allow themselves to defile their old attractions. Mr. Toad's hell scene has been iconic since the day the park opened, and most of the little collectables based on the ride even use the miniature devils as key iconography. I can't help but feel that even the most cynical, statistics-obsessed executive would feel a little bit soulless removing the brilliant ending scene of an opening day attraction thought up by the original Imagineers and replacing it with some inoffensive, vapid garbage just because the scene could possibly scare a few literal toddlers here and there. There isn't even anything "politically incorrect" about Toad's hell scene either; it's a tongue-in-cheek pastiche of the Christian hell. There isn't a single offensive thing about it.
No one's "obsessed" with making Disneyland PC. Anyone thinking that is profoundly misreading these boards or getting all their news from Twitter. If anyone is genuinely interested in that I suspect they're cubicle drones from inside Disney's own offices.You never know. You just never know.
Also, isn't "hell" considered a curse word? That alone would likely make the guys obsessed with making Disneyland "PC" want to change it.
I still fully expect them to change Mr. Toad's ending, or get rid of it entirely, at some point. What with them being on a PC kick and everything.
Miss Toad's Inclusive Drive
New Snow White poster installed in the entrance tunnel:
View attachment 545598
God that name really sucks.New Snow White poster installed in the entrance tunnel:
View attachment 545598
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.