Wilt Dasney
Well-Known Member
I think it's apples to oranges. Disney can advertise DL as being in Anaheim because it's a real city that existed before Disney, has two major professional league sports teams, and just generally is an actual place with its own identity, even though it's also part of the greater Los Angeles sprawl.I understand that many people have never heard of Lake Buena Vista, but Disney should still advertise WDW as being in Lake Buena Vista. Many people believe Disneyland is in Los Angeles, but Disney doesn't advertise it as such.
Lake Buena Vista isn't even a small town, technically speaking. It's a census-defined area owned entirely by Disney. The only permanent residents are Disney employees who vote in company-held elections to put Disney employees on the city council who will set tax rates and zoning requirements according to Disney's preferences. It literally only exists because Florida allowed Disney to have total control over the area to lure them into the state, and setting up a company town was the best way to make that happen. Why advertise your parks as being in a place like that, even if it's the technical mailing address? The parks are in metropolitan Orlando, and that's much easier for visitors to make sense of.
Not trying to prolong an argument by any means, but I just think the two situations are very different.