TrainsOfDisney
Well-Known Member
Source?Recent surveys from Uni indicates they maybe looking at adding a reservation system too.
Source?Recent surveys from Uni indicates they maybe looking at adding a reservation system too.
Can't speak for OP, but I received a survey strongly seeking approval of reservations by Uni and I shot it down...vehemently. I'd cancel my AP over it.Source?
Source?
They should replace aps with an actual loyalty program. Spend more, get more.
I think this is what Disney wants IMO, less APs, more ticket buyers and less crowds.The danger of encouraging APs not to renew and to become day guests is we won’t go 7 times a year if we’re paying out of pocket vs prepaid, APs and Keys encourage frequent visits to maximize value, if we’re paying out of pocket we‘ll end up going other places.
This isn’t a problem. In California there were times when DL park had too many local AP’s - that can easily be solved.and solves the too many AP problem
I mean the company has aggressively raised prices and reduced benefits on APs while ticket prices barely increase at all but are mostly the same as they were a few years back.This isn’t a problem. In California there were times when DL park had too many local AP’s - that can easily be solved.
I think this is what Disney wants IMO, less APs, more ticket buyers and less crowds.
It makes sense to me and solves the too many AP problem (besides weekdays which are all mess).
I agree though it makes little sense to have an AP for many these days when you can just visit with day tickets.
Disneyland 1 day ticket in 2005 = $56.00I mean the company has aggressively raised prices and reduced benefits on APs while ticket prices barely increase at all but are mostly the same as they were a few years back.
To me this signifies that APs were underpriced, the high end ones at least.
I don't believe the bolded for a moment. I have no doubt they want more of their crowds paying more per day for their tickets, but they only want to diminish APs to make room for more (higher paying) day guests.I think this is what Disney wants IMO, less APs, more ticket buyers and less crowds.
I don't believe the bolded for a moment. I have no doubt they want more of their crowds paying more per day for their tickets, but they only want to diminish APs to make room for more (higher paying) day guests.
Why? The CEO literally said in a shareholder meeting that they found out lower crowds gave them higher revenue than before.I don't believe the bolded for a moment. I have no doubt they want more of their crowds paying more per day for their tickets, but they only want to diminish APs to make room for more (higher paying) day guests.
I know you think this is true based on your own personal experience, but Disney has all the data. They know how many AP/Keys they have and how many day pass guests they have each day in the park. They can approximate how much each spends based on the number of visits and the type of ticket used. Especially since most APs will use the discount that comes with their pass. So there is no need to guess, or even be confused. They have all the data, and they are making business decisions based on that data, even if its counter to your own personal experience.The problem is I don’t think it’ll drive away the true locals who go dozens (or hundreds) of times a year, the new system is likely driving away the highest spending APs who needed to plan ahead, stayed at the hotels, and ate every meal in the parks.
Those who live close enough can still pop in whenever a reservation opens up and still get great value, those are also the same people who are least likely to spend money at the hotels and restaurants since they sleep at home and can easily grab McDonalds after they leave the park.
Seems counterproductive but I don’t understand most of Disneys management decisions these days. I’ve come to grips with doing less Disney, for us it just means getting out of our comfort zone and trying more new places, I don’t get it from a business perspective though, encouraging loyal customers (who spend tens of thousands a year at your property) to spend their money elsewhere makes no sense.
Maybe just me, but the post inventing a Darth Vader Disneyland quote seems a little more odd than the ones suggesting legacy APs will never come back.it’s really odd that some posters are taking an almost “even villain” tone in this thread. Imagine Darth Vader saying this to Luke -
“I know how you lifestylers loved your passes. But guess what? Disney has all the data now. They know everything. You think you’re going to get your pass back? It’s gone forever. We destroyed it.”
Seems like one of the more logical Star Wars plot points to me!Maybe just me, but the post inventing a Darth Vader Disneyland quote seems a little more odd than the ones suggesting legacy APs will never come back.
Why? The CEO literally said in a shareholder meeting that they found out lower crowds gave them higher revenue than before.
The fact is they are trying to reach a certain level of crowds to maximize profits. It doesn't mean maxing out capacity.
Try winning a political argument with “but the POTUS literally said” - CEO’s are just as bad as politicians. They will say whatever they need to say to make the shareholders believe that there brilliant idea is making them more money.The CEO literally said in a shareholder meeting that they found out lower crowds gave them higher revenue than before.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.