Old Mouseketeer
Well-Known Member
OK, it would have been more accurate for me to recognize that the article quotes from relevant government documents, but the article is still framed in the propaganda viewpoint of the website. And the fact remains that the federal government owns and directly controls 18.5 million acres or 57%. State and local governments own about one million acres, or 3%. The remainder are non-industrial entitites (8 million/25%) and industrial owners (4-5 million/14%--primarily timber companies).and that's what the article says but the kind gentleman from Orange County can't be bothered to read it. Instead he tries to get the post deleted by running up the "anti-science" flag pole
The point that has been made repeatedly to the charges that CA has mismanaged forests is that the federal government has direct control of 57% of forest lands. The state has direct control of 3% and indirect control of 39%. What I am objecting to is the canard that "California has mismanaged the forests and therefore there is no blame to climate change". This ignores the massive responsibility of the federal government in all this. The documents cited in the article point to a multitude of contributing factors that should be discussed and debated in responsible, reputable forums. But the website you cited is neither--it is an anti-science propaganda website. It is firmly allied with corporate-backed efforts to deny climate change and flood the conversation with junk science, thus my display of unbridled contempt. And I never tried to get anything deleted--I just called it what it is: propaganda.