I wish Disney would start pushing back on these news articles. If it didn't happen on their property then it's really not pertinent to the story that they worked for Disney.
I wish Disney would start pushing back on these news articles. If it didn't happen on their property then it's really not pertinent to the story that they worked for Disney.
Agreed, but how would you propose they do that? Just a mention of something happening within the area of Disney gives many a news editor/manager the inspiration that they can add their name to help generate more views. Their PR people may have said something about it already, if not though, they could do a lot of good by coming out with a statement just saying something like "they're fully cooperating with officials and want noting less than to see justice served to protect innocent lives".
Every time Disney is mentioned in one of these when they are not directly involved should be answered with a lawsuit against the news source. That would be an excellent start.Agreed, but how would you propose they do that? Just a mention of something happening within the area of Disney gives many a news editor/manager the inspiration that they can add their name to help generate more views. Their PR people may have said something about it already, if not though, they could do a lot of good by coming out with a statement just saying something like "they're fully cooperating with officials and want noting less than to see justice served to protect innocent lives".
Every time Disney is mentioned in one of these when they are not directly involved should be answered with a lawsuit against the news source. That would be an excellent start.
Libel.On what grounds?
But they did work for Disney.Libel.
But that has no relevance to the story.But they did work for Disney.
I would not like it but if it's the truth it's not illegal to print it.But that has no relevance to the story.
How would you like it if someone you knew was accused of being a pedophile and when reported they associated that person to you, by name.
Could really care less if it's Disney, Uni, or The Salvation Army. If it didn't happen on Disney property, then adding the name of the employer of the pervert to the story really adds no value.Oh please ... the fact they work for Disney is quite pertinent. Disney attracts millions of kids to the Florida swamps annually ... it also attracts a great deal of pedophiles.
It's great to see fans worried about Disney's sterling image, though. ... insanity.
Except to inform people. They could just not report the story at all...Could really care less if it's Disney, Uni, or The Salvation Army. If it didn't happen on Disney property, then adding the name of the employer of the pervert to the story really adds no value.
Could really care less if it's Disney, Uni, or The Salvation Army. If it didn't happen on Disney property, then adding the name of the employer of the pervert to the story really adds no value.
Could really care less if it's Disney, Uni, or The Salvation Army. If it didn't happen on Disney property, then adding the name of the employer of the pervert to the story really adds no value.
The commonly used definition of libel indicates that it involves a false statement, but if you look at the complete definition it includes "a written or oral defamatory statement or representation that conveys an unjustly unfavorable impression. "..."A statement or representation published without just cause and tending to expose another to public contempt. "I would not like it but if it's the truth it's not illegal to print it.
And that's the problem I see with it and so much more..... Sensationalism to increase views and followers. Can't just report the pertinent facts, the story has to be dramatized in order to attract attention.I totally agree it doesn't pertain to the story but it is not illegal to print that fact. It's all about getting people to read/click on the article. And Disney and a child sexual abuse charges in a headline will do that.
The news business is a business they need to make money to survive. They sell ads based on viewers/readers. Not saying it's right but it they way it has always been.And that's the problem I see with it and so much more..... Sensationalism to increase views and followers. Can't just report the pertinent facts, the story has to be dramatized in order to attract attention.
I am confused as to what this has to do with a child sex-sting?If only Disney would allow their cast members to marry...
And that's the problem I see with it and so much more..... Sensationalism to increase views and followers. Can't just report the pertinent facts, the story has to be dramatized in order to attract attention.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.