Yup, and maybe instead of spending 75k for a liberal arts or communications degree, go out to a good trade school or through your high school, apprentice and within 5 years, you could be making 100k/yr without school loans.
That's exactly the problem. People who racked up student debt are now demanding wages commensurate with their education for roles that don't require said education in the first place.
I wish it could be entirely subjective. There are enormous tattoos that look clean and professional, and there are small tattoos that look sloppy and gross.
Just personally experience, but a large number of private business owners I have worked with have the mentality that their employees are basically stealing from them and honestly can't believe people expect raises, benefits, a competitive salary, etc. Not all, I have seen some pretty great ones too but there are a disturbing amount of the previous type.
I don’t really have a problem with seeing others tattoos, whether they be well done or not, but in a way I wish they would’ve just kept the no tattoos policy because it is kind of hard to enforce
I have no problem with a student deciding to work through a degree they want. That's their choice, and may not end with a return they necessarily want.
So you want less people going to college?
Unequivocally yes.
I'm seeing this blame pop up on behalf of a student who wants higher education, and not at a system that puts insurmountable financial stress on those who take on these degrees that do not match their value.
Why do you want less people to achieve a higher level of education?
That's interesting - because I've been told the exact opposite by current CMs. Extremely open to interpertation and some in leadership tend to interperet it differently than others. Which de facto, means that it's been walked back on a somewhat individual basis.
From what I was told by a coordinator who I'm mates with, that's 100% right - there's also content restrictions. No Trek or Potter for example (which was, alegeddly, an issue for some). But yeah, it's extremely vague. Unlike the rest of the Look guidelines (I have various versions of the handouts around in my hard-drive from over the years and it's fascinating but stringent).
I have a 4 year college degree, started at entry level and moved up the food chain. Would I attend college if I rolled back time - No. I applied next to nothing what I learned in school to my roles. I started working at 14 when in school and I learned through hard work , developing relationships and going above and beyond through work. What college taught me was to live on my own away from my family.
This 100%
Define "higher education."
Is this true??? I don’t think that can possibly be legal.
I said many, many pages ago that college tuition and college profits SHOULD be one of the main (if not THE main political platform issues…the fact that neither side of the isle even brings up this talking point is disgusting. At the same time, it’s still ultimately personal responsibility to decide whether that career path is economically feasible to lead a financially successful life in the real world.
Told to me by multiple people who I trust, so yeah, I have no reason to doubt the truth.. And it's legal - at least as long as they apply it the same in every case, like a business having any other reasonable grooming regulation.
That is very much not enforced. I had a cast member (who was amazing and I won't rat her out because if I said the location she worked at, it would narrow things down very quickly) with a very prominent Potter tattoo.
