So I'd basically be buying another $16,000 in points I'd never use. Sure, I could rent them out each year and get my money back, but why tie up $16,000 for 24 years and only get $684 of it back each year?
...
I guess my point is for me, because I take short vacations of just a few nights, I don't feel the DVC buy-in of 160 points is cost effective.
DVC has been known to sell contracts with as little as 100 points to new members. Sub-160 point contracts are also available on the resale market for very reasonable prices.
Renting is good for occasional trips but I'd be hard pressed to believe that it's a sensible (financial) approach for someone who makes frequent return trips. There are a number of perks available to members but not renters (and that disparity may get even worse in years to come.) Most renters have very restrictive cancellation policies, assuming they allow ANY changes or cancellations. Renting points to book a trip 11 months out can be difficult and involves it's own substantial cash outlay.
And it's important to note that DVC contracts continue to hold value on the resale market until the contract's end date arrives. In the one example provided here, an ownership period of only 24 years is examined. If one buys into the Bay Lake Tower and decides to sell the contract after 24 years, there will still be 26 years of ownership remaining. That contract will return thousands of dollars when sold on the resale market.