I respect you as a poster and think your content is generally very strong, but you're WILDLY off base here. And I think it's worth discussing and expanding the analogy even at the risk of belaboring it, because the central point is key - Pride Month is considered political, controversial, and exclusionary while St. Patrick's isn't because the Irish community is considered "normal" (this hasn't always been the case) and isn't being actively politically persecuted while the LGBTQ is considered "abnormal" by many and is the target of focused political attacks.
The first point is a minor one, but it should be said - Finnegan's is not an Irish Pub, it isn't even really THEMED to an Irish pub (its a set), its a theme park restaurant. The St Patrick's day decorations aren't the work of a proprietor celebrating their heritage, its the work of a megacorporation decorating a theme park, just like the pride mural on the purple wall.
You act as though all of the St. Patrick's day celebrations at the theme parks are entirely localized the Irish Pubs - that's not true. Here's a
guide to St Patrick's Day food at Disneyland. Disney World has a similar but less impressive list (our food offerings are ALWAYS less impressive). In addition, there's a significant assortment of special merchandise for St. Patrick's Day. And of course, the Disney characters dress in Irish themed outfits. The celebration is park wide.
Let's go even bigger. Chinese New Year at DCA is a parkwide celebration that is bigger then any other festival at the park except, perhaps, Christmas. It's a celebration of Chinese identity that dwarfs Pride Month. Is it exclusionary? Offensive?
Now let's step back to discuss the issue of Irish pubs. Such Pubs can serve as focal points for the St Patrick's Day celebration at Universal and Disney because there are several of them in the Orlando parks - Finnegan's, Raglan Road, Pat O'Brien's. It's not a coincidence, of course, that there are no LGBTQ themed bars or restaurants to serve as the focus of Pride Month activities. And if Disney were to open such a restaurant - or a Hamburger Mary's - the howls of the posters kvetching about a pride mural would be far, far louder. Cables news programs would feast on the story for months. Local and national politicians would be apoplectic and, in the current environment, would almost certainly introduce legislation designed to harm the company. The slurs already levelled at Disney would become deafening. So... yeah, arguing that Disney could just open an LGBTQ restaurant to focus the Pride Month activities is disingenuous. We need to think about why they haven't, and won't, do that.
Finally, I'm by no means an expert on the topic, but its my understanding that Disney DOES hold special meaning for a significant portion of the LGBTQ community. Its one of the reasons that Chapek's disgustingly clumsy efforts to dodge controversy earlier this year were doomed to failure.