Disney Skyliner shutdown and evacuation - October 6 2019

EdnaMode

Well-Known Member
Right? I mean how strange! He was just explaining why we were concerned, since we have a 1-year old. For the CM to get defensive and debate online accounts from people who were there seemed petty and unprofessional. I can’t imagine their quality control department was thrilled with how the CM acted. My husband wasn’t upset or defiant, just explaining our concerns and seeing what options were available.

Strange and very unwise. Someone said it to your husband, you posted it here, guests who were trapped for three hours just got to read it. And I think most people who had been up there for 3 hours and read this would be rightfully thinking that their experience was, at best, being diminished, and, at worst, they were being called liars.

Somebody needs to hold a morning meeting.
 

RSoxNo1

Well-Known Member
People are claiming Disney "cheaped out" on the gondola system.

So... proof? How are any of you backing up that claim?

Our Trusted Insiders have said WDW was spending way more than needed for this system, so, burden of proof is on the accusers.
Not to make the opposing argument for them, but the "cheaped out" argument would be against another form of transportation (i.e. a monorail). As far as gondola systems go, it doesn't appear they cheaped out, despite the lack of AC.
 

monothingie

Nakatomi Plaza Christmas Eve 1988. Never Forget.
Premium Member
Unverified references... (aka haven't cross referenced enough) say ~9:30
Do we have a time for when emergency services first started the evac process?
Orlando Sentinel article said they were dispatched at 8:27. They had 27 FF respond and 2 Supervisors. They also called mutual aid fire from Orange and Osceola County Fire/Rescue. So about an hour after dispatch for rescues to begin sounds right.
 

monothingie

Nakatomi Plaza Christmas Eve 1988. Never Forget.
Premium Member
I am sure they will review everything that happened that night and hopefully learn some things from it.
And then raise prices.

Think of it, VIP Evacuation packages. Survive in style with bottled Smart Water, a battery operated fan, fresh snacks and Priority FP+ Rescue, instead of being left for dead with bagged water and a glow stick. Now available for booking $299.99 per person plus tax. DVC/AP Discount available.
 

natatomic

Well-Known Member
Oh yeah! Well..one of the tests I watched the temperature raised three degrees! (really, but that's also read tongue in cheek)

Even that instance though, it was non-scientific and just showed bias. It didn't account for variations in the cabin design, position of the sun, etc. It did note the time of day though which was nice. I'm sure Disney has all of the data and has done a full study but whatever their findings are will never be made public. The nerd in me though would love to read that stuff.

not to mention, was this test done after they had already spent the money and erected the lines, and hung up the cabins? If so, there would be significant pressure for them to reach the “correct” result.
 

fosse76

Well-Known Member
There's a reason most amusement parks (and Disney) stopped using these as rides in their parks. They are inefficient, maintenance headaches, and I was shocked that Disney built these eyesores as a means of mass transportation. I am a little bewildered that some people question why others are questioning why Disney didn't shut down the entire system after the accident. The reason Disney would shut down the entire system is simple: they don't know that actual cause of the accident. They may have known at the time it was a power failure that caused the cabins to collide, but they most assuredly didn't know the cause of that power failure, and whether or not it could easily occur on the other line. They also didn't know if the rollback was indeed the result of that failure. It's about mitigating their liability. I am surprised Disney didn't shut it all down.

As to the poster who is belittling the evacuation time: this isn't a training exercise for navy seals, and even if you can get a cherry picker to reach the cabin in a minute or two doesn't change the danger of the evacuation (or Disney's liability). For one thing, the cabins aren't stationary objects. They are swinging on that line, and there is the very real (though unlikely) possibility of unsecured guests falling. There was an incident at Six Flags Great America when the rear axle of a roller coaster train separated and wedged in-between the rails of the tracks. Unfortunately, it occurred in the second loop of the ride. Before they could even begin to evacuate, they had to secure the train to the tracks to make sure it wouldn't dislodge during the evacuation. Then they had had to secure the occupants of each car prior to releasing the restraints. While obviously there wasn't this level of security required, the could just go up there and hop in. Forcing someone into a harness in less than a minute is going to cause that cabin to swing, and not everyone is going to be calm about it.

Though the compensation seems to some as inadequate, I'm not so sure. It was at most a major inconvenience, so unless you were in one of the cabins that collided, I think this was fair compensation.
 

Incomudro

Well-Known Member
I'm really interested to hear what Doppelmayr has to say about the incident. The latest article from the Orlando Sentinel says they have yet to respond to requests for comment. https://www.orlandosentinel.com/bus...0191007-hkjv7v2ainfmne2hyb66luxqfy-story.html

This is a newer design from them - could there be some design flaw that allows this fault to occur?

Yes, I'm wondering if there is a lot of finger pointing going on?
Is WDW majorly upset with Doppelmayr?
Is Doppelmayr blaming Disney?
 

MrPromey

Well-Known Member
It's certainly a valid lesson learned. A simpler solution would be to simply put RFID readers on the towers and tag the cabins. The system can simply track the last tower that 'saw' the cabin thus greatly reducing the search radius immediately. Then the cabin side of the system is completely passive and doesn't require power or refreshes.

Also, put some reflective number stickers on the bottom as well to improve visibility at night. Cheap and effective.

ETA: a problem with this system tho is the dependency on power and memory... which is a high probability of 'not being there' in emergency situations. Passive systems always work best in these fault-tolerant situations.

Magic Bands to the rescue! :D
 
Last edited:

trainplane3

Well-Known Member
I absolutely cannot stand that Disney doesn’t explain what happened on attractions that stop. In my 23 years of visiting, I’ve never seen an engineer or cast member say what has gone wrong in person. There’s only one video I have ever seen of an engineer explain what what wrong when ToT went down. Cool video, wish they did this every time.

I think this is a rare occasion when an engineer is directly present with guests. Usually they’re busy fixing the problems. Cast Members might not know the detailed issue with a stop.
Funny. We broke down on ToT right as we were rolling into the drop shaft. Maintenance came up behind, asked if everyone was fine, then manually pulled the cab out. As he was unloading us he explained what happened (ever so slightly out of alignment when going into the drop shaft). It might just be a ToT thing. We were being loaded back into a elevator in less then 15 minutes.
 

Bender123

Well-Known Member
Quote of the year

Except that's not at all the reason...The old systems were removed because they had passive restraints and open cabs that allowed dumb people to do dumb things, like throw items over, spit on people, jump out (on occasion), etc...

Comparing these systems would be like saying a motorcycle is like a Semi, because they both have wheels and a motor.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
I thought we were talking about the 3 hour stops that happened here, but admittedly I've had a tough time following all the side conversations.

In the first days of people allowed to video their experience of the gondolas, some of the vloggers took thermometers with them and showed only a degree raise in temperature when the gondola stopped.
 

LSLS

Well-Known Member
In the first days of people allowed to video their experience of the gondolas, some of the vloggers took thermometers with them and showed only a degree raise in temperature when the gondola stopped.

Ok, but in the context of these stopping for 3 hours, that really doesn't mean anything. I mean, not to go back to the car analogy, but my car does not appreciably heat up when I stop and turn the car off for a couple minutes either (let me add I fully believe these stay much cooler than a car as well, not trying to rehash all that).

For what it's worth, I fully believe the vents are perfectly fine when the cars are in motion/stopped for short periods. I have trouble believing if this stop happened at 2:00 you would see only a 1 degree increase in temp.
 

Phil12

Well-Known Member
Your grasp of basic science is woefully... bad.

That chart is from NOAA for situations of *prolonged exposure* or strenuous activity. NOAA issues heat warnings if there's going to be more than 2 days of elevated heat.

You're claim of 1 degree makes a huge difference is completely absurd and ridiculous.

Here are the parts you're (intentionally?) leaving out...

View attachment 416751

Obviously, this isn't a chart for what happens in just a few hours with a one degree increase being the difference between life and death.
Obviously, you are cherry picking since the very next line states, "Since heat index values were devised for shady, light wind conditions, exposure to full sunshine can increase heat index values by up to 15°F. Also, strong winds, particularly with very hot, dry air, can be extremely hazardous."

No one said anything about the difference between life and death. But even a few minutes in the Danger Zone can be uncomfortable and a few hours can lead to health problems. Your exaggerations of death are insipid.

People in reasonably good health will tolerate heat extremes better than very young or very old people. Also, folks with chronic health problems are more susceptible such as people that take certain high blood pressure medications.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom