Magenta Panther
Well-Known Member
Still snorting that (remade) pixie-dust, huh?Still wasting those minutes, huh?
Still snorting that (remade) pixie-dust, huh?Still wasting those minutes, huh?
It is, visually. The lost boys are goofy, idiot boys. They act the way boys and men act when there are no women around to civilize them.But none of this was conveyed in the animated film either.
But none of this was conveyed in the animated film either.
Trust that you too are “snorting pixie-dust.”Still snorting that (remade) pixie-dust, huh?
I watched the film countless times as a child (and as an adult). It wasn’t evident to me. Wendy for me symbolised the need for motherhood and hence parenthood, not the civilising influence of women.It is, visually. The lost boys are goofy, idiot boys. They act the way boys and men act when there are no women around to civilize them.
And they stay behind in Never Land. They don’t become men, they stay with Peter. So, Wendy didn’t doesn’t influence them enough.It is, visually. The lost boys are goofy, idiot boys. They act the way boys and men act when there are no women around to civilize them.
I watched the film countless times as a child (and as an adult). It wasn’t evident to me. Wendy for me symbolised the need for motherhood and hence parenthood, not the civilising influence of women.
My beef with this movie is not that it deviated from the animated version.And they stay behind in Never Land. They don’t become men, they stay with Peter. So, Wendy didn’t doesn’t influence them enough.
Fair enough. It’s one my personal favourites.My beef with this movie is not that it deviated from the animated version.
I'm not really a fan of the animated version, either.
Masculinity and femininity are cultural universals. They're the product of millions of years of biological and psychological evolution. You don't get to erase that in a span of 100 years. These weren't imposed on anyone by fiat, they emerged organically out of the primordial ooze.Given that this film was made now and not decades ago, I think it’s perfectly acceptable to change the original idea that there could never be lost girls because they’re too “clever,” which is code for too intelligent, too sweet, too careful, too dainty, and what have you, all dated ways of looking at girls and women in general. Of course there can be wayward, lost girls. As much as I love the novel, it’s a product of its time.
And women can be “lost.” We’re not perfect.Masculinity and femininity are cultural universals. They're the product of millions of years of biological and psychological evolution. You don't get to erase that in a span of 100 years. These weren't imposed on anyone by fiat, they emerged organically out of the primordial ooze.
Men and women are different.
Having grown up as a boy who felt very alienated by the expectations of masculinity around him, I’m glad today’s young people are exposed to a larger range of possibilities. The more traditional male-female dynamics you’re referring to remain the mainstream and aren’t going anywhere.Masculinity and femininity are cultural universals. They're the product of millions of years of biological and psychological evolution. You don't get to erase that in a span of 100 years. These weren't imposed on anyone by fiat, they emerged organically out of the primordial ooze.
Men and women are different.
It's simply amazing how some people think they can re-define the meaning of words to suit them. Seems to be a plague of that these days.Given that this film was made now and not decades ago, I think it’s perfectly acceptable to change the original idea that there could never be lost girls because they’re too “clever,” which is code for too intelligent, too sweet, too careful, too dainty, and what have you, all dated ways of looking at girls and women in general. Of course there can be wayward, lost girls. As much as I love the novel, it’s a product of its time.
This, exactly.Having grown up as a boy who felt very alienated by the expectations of masculinity around me, I’m glad today’s young people are exposed to a larger range of possibilities. The more traditional male-female dynamics you’re referring to remain the mainstream and aren’t going anywhere.
You didn’t understand my post. Shocking. Hoo boy, indeed.It's simply amazing how some people think they can re-define the meaning of words to suit them. Seems to be a plague of that these days.
Imagine thinking that calling a girl "clever" is a misogynist insult of some sort. Hoo boy.
My beef with this movie is not that it deviated from the animated version.
I'm not really a fan of the animated version, either.
You didn’t understand my post. Shocking. Hoo boy, indeed.
But, hey, if you want to uphold the idea that only boys are stupid, clumsy, and wayward, by all means.
Where did I insinuate that the idea that women/girls are too cute, clever, and dainty to be lost and wayward is anti-woman? You made that up. That’s your problem.Prove that I was trying to uphold that idea. I was defending the idea that girls can be clever and that calling them such is not misogynist. Is that a problem?
I don't disagree with any of this, but the storytelling has to suit the art form. When you're operating in the land of myth, legend, and fairy tale, you have to employ archetypes if you want it to resonate with the greatest number of people.Having grown up as a boy who felt very alienated by the expectations of masculinity around him, I’m glad today’s young people are exposed to a larger range of possibilities. The more traditional male-female dynamics you’re referring to remain the mainstream and aren’t going anywhere.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.