Figment2005
Well-Known Member
Not once did he call it dull. He called it narrow.But why call it dull when they modeled it almost exactly as it looked in the movies? Unless you consider the movie scenes dull.
Not once did he call it dull. He called it narrow.But why call it dull when they modeled it almost exactly as it looked in the movies? Unless you consider the movie scenes dull.
I agree..even though I disagree with him on how narrow it actually is, it was just an observationAll he did was make a general observation. A somewhat accurate observation. Cut the guy some slack already.
Not once did he call it dull. He called it narrow.
it's not pathetic... it's the truth. I'm not bashing what they have created... all I am saying is that street is going to be massively crowded with no where to walk and you are surrounded entirely by tall, dull alley-way type buildings on either side.
yeah I disagree with the dull partActually, he did...
I think he meant to emphasize the narrow appearance of the area, but the use of the word "dull" threw many people off when they read his post.
Alright, I stand corrected.Actually, he did...
I think he meant to emphasize the narrow appearance of the area, but the use of the word "dull" threw many people off when they read his post.
yeah I disagree with the dull part
Alright, I stand corrected.
with the dull part..i see nothing dull in diagon alleyYou disagree with what? The use of the word "dull" to describe the alley, or my interpretation of his use of the word in his post? Personally, I think the alley looks exactly as it should.
Yeah... this thread has gotten so far off track because of that one silly argument that it's almost as hard to keep up with as a spirited thread lol.
He's popped in a few times with the same observation, repeating it for no reason other than to drum up some drama. I could cut him some slack were he not a repeat offender of this behavior.All he did was make a general observation. A somewhat accurate observation. Cut the guy some slack already.
Themed entertainment is a creative medium. Their success is measured by fans more in their execution and content than in their revenue.
Thank goodness they've nothing to worry about then with the Potter franchise....But if the execution and content is better than why are you so far behind your competition? It's a fail to understand how to get your audience to invest in you. Universal will throw together an attraction to any movie that makes 200 million without even caring how fast it will be obsolete
This is not meant as an insult but it is quite apparent that most of you on here know nothing about running a BIG business. I keep hearing folks on this board refer to the fact that UNI isn't taking sales away from WDW and that until they do Disney will not react. The fact of the matter that is not how BIG businesses look at things. When Walmart sees Target's Billions of dollars in Sales they don't say "well it's ok because our sales are still going up. They Say Target has Billions in dollars of our sales. When Pizza hut sees Dominos doing $4 billion in Sales they say "That's our $4 billion and we have to find a way to get it back" It's the same with UNI They are doing Billions of dollars in Sales and that money should be and COULD BE Disney's. The Simple fact is that is if Disney would have built the UO resort IT WOULD BE their Dollars. Big Businesses look at it like this...All the money in the world is ours and we have to find a way to get it in our bank account. That's what Disney thinks and that's what they should be thinking. All the Billions that UNI is making IS coming out of Disney's pot!
The same reasons a great film may not be a box office juggernaut. Even if a film property is soon to be forgotten, that is irrelevant to the theme park attraction.But if the execution and content is better than why are you so far behind your competition? It's a fail to understand how to get your audience to invest in you. Universal will throw together an attraction to any movie that makes 200 million without even caring how fast it will be obsolete
Overdo the budget?!?I did watch the video of the Hogwarts express...and yes it does look nice but really it's just a tv screen and some audio effects..other than that its just a train ride. Some of what they have done at Universal reminds me of how they do their movies overdo the budget under achieve the story
do you really mean this or are you being sarcastic?I did watch the video of the Hogwarts express...and yes it does look nice but really it's just a tv screen and some audio effects..other than that its just a train ride. Some of what they have done at Universal reminds me of how they do their movies overdo the budget under achieve the story
I've been on the Hogwarts Express and can tell you from experience, just like every other ride, it's better in person and more than "just a TV screen". IMO the most impressive part of it isn't the window display, but the view outside your cabin within the train. The effect looks incredibly realistic and very believable. It looks much better in person obviously but this picture should get the point across.I did watch the video of the Hogwarts express...and yes it does look nice but really it's just a tv screen and some audio effects..other than that its just a train ride. Some of what they have done at Universal reminds me of how they do their movies overdo the budget under achieve the story
But then you could also say the same thing about the folks that kept arguing with him.He's popped in a few times with the same observation, repeating it for no reason other than to drum up some drama. I could cut him some slack were he not a repeat offender of this behavior.
it's just a tv screen and some audio effects..other than that its just a train ride.
But then you could also say the same thing about the folks that kept arguing with him.
But then you could also say the same thing about the folks that kept arguing with him.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.