News Disney plans to include a black Santa Claus at Walt Disney World this year as the company continues its diversity and inclusion program

LittleBuford

Well-Known Member
@LittleBuford - My definition of "racism" is simple. It's treating people differently than you otherwise would, based on their ethnicity or the color of their skin. I believe this is a terrible and immoral way to deal with people. I'm 100% sincere about this and I'm sure all of us agree.

However, there seems to be "two" types of "racism" in this world today:

1.) "Bad racism" = Treating people negatively with bad intention based on race.
2.) "Good racism" = Promoting and favoring people "specifically" because of their race.

#1 is bad,...we ALL agree! No question. #2 is debatable because "THAT" racism is based on "good intentions". In other words, "good racism" is designed to correct and compensate for the bad racism that has existed on Earth for thousands of years.

The fallacy is...you cannot correct and fix racist thinking....by using MORE racist thinking! We are teaching ourselves NOT to use race as a factor in dealing with each other,...then turn right around again and say that we SHOULD use race as a factor as long as our intentions are good.

Which is it? Are we NOT supposed to look at skin color...or are we SUPPOSED to look at it?

You can't fix bad racism by trying to reverse it with good racism. Racism needs to be eradicated from ALL of our thinking. Negative AND positive!

Only THEN will we achieve the social equality goals we are all looking for.
“Reverse racism”, or what you call “good racism”, isn’t a thing. The history of the world and its institutions would have to be vastly different for there to be any sort of equivalence. We’re way off topic, but if you’re genuinely interested in pondering this issue:

 

Brian

Well-Known Member
“Reverse racism”, or what you call “good racism”, isn’t a thing. The history of the world and its institutions would have to be vastly different for there to be any sort of equivalence. We’re way off topic, but if you’re genuinely interested in pondering this issue:

You're right. It's not like there's companies exclusively searching for "diverse candidates," or schools who give preference to "non-white" applicants, or companies who fire executives for being a white male, or businesses charging white customers 2.5x more than their non-white counterparts, or college professors opining that they wish to "take these motherf****** [white people] out." And who can forget the college professor who said: "white people should commit suicide as an ethical act?"

I'd post more examples, but I know it wouldn't change your mind or the minds of any others.

And by the way, it's not reverse racism. There's no such thing. Black people don't have a monopoly on being the target of racism, at least not anymore. Racism towards white people is, in fact, still racism.
 
Last edited:

LittleBuford

Well-Known Member
@LittleBuford

You brought up the fact that Black Panther is “literally in the name”

I would agree completely.

Does this not apply to Snow White?
I mean, sure—the character’s name reflects the fact that she has light skin. My bigger point had to do with the history of representation (looking at the demographics of the Disney princesses exemplifies what I’m getting at).
 

champdisney

Well-Known Member
I'm cool with this.

However, I don't see the need for Disney to publicize it. This year at Halloween Horror Nights, The Bride of Frankenstein happened to be black and it was just as fun and exciting.

I know. The Bride of Frankenstein and Santa Claus are two separate entities, with Santa Claus being the bigger deal out of the two. Yet, they are both works of fiction, and in our modern culture, we can have various versions of the same characters.

No need to make it such a big deal. Most of us don't care. We'll enjoy it just as much.
 

champdisney

Well-Known Member
They haven’t.
Well, then they purposely leaked it for other platforms to publicize it for them.

That company knows how to do things the slickest and cheapest way but that's another discussion for another time.

The fact remains, any sane person does not care about this. If by chance there are people that do, which there is, that does not qualify them as being racist.
 

Brian

Well-Known Member
Back to basics, I'm almost certain that Disney will forego any kind of public announcement about this, lest they call attention to the matter and garner less than flattering press and criticism with the right-wing media.

That said, I wouldn't be surprised to see an official photo or clip with a black Santa in it come up in a company-sponsored social media post about the after hours event or the holiday festivities property-wide. Certainly not with a giant arrow pointing to him; just that mixed in with some other things.
 
Last edited:

champdisney

Well-Known Member
Anybody remember the reports of Kevin Hart in talks with Disney to star as the next Santa Claus in a reboot/remake of The Santa Clause?


This dates back to 2016! Nothing ever came of it, possibly due to the fact that Kevin Hart is more suitable to portray an elf over Santa...

All jokes aside, this should indicate that Disney has, for a while, been interested in introducing a black Santa Claus into their little magical universe... or whatever it is they call it.
 

Quinnmac000

Well-Known Member
The main reason for a multi-cultural Santa is because Santa is an inspirational figure used to instill hope and goodness. Additionally to this day universally skin tone is still associated with "good and bad", having a darker skin Santa being good would be really beneficial for children with darker complexions that have certain complexes.

Because Santa is not real and doesn't have to be real and is already played by so many different people already (mall santas all look different), he is the perfect figure to be the driver for this change. He is international so he already travels the world.

In the origins of Santa his racial identity wasn't talked about just a fat man in a red suit with a white beard who said ho ho ho. It wasn't until the 19th century and Coca Cola advertisements in the 30s that the modern day Santa came about.
 

Budd

Active Member
I vaguely remember seeing a documentary awhile ago on National Geographic or something, about the origins of St. Nicholas. Basically he was a real tough guy who helped spread the gospel of Christianity, and would sometimes beat up mockers and blasphemous folk. He wasn't the jolly giver of gifts we know today. I'm not sure the name of the Christmas documentary this segment was included in, but it was hosted or narrated by Kirk Cameron. I'm sure it's on YouTube somewhere. I found it interesting but not sure how much of it I buy into.
 

John park hopper

Well-Known Member
I vaguely remember seeing a documentary awhile ago on National Geographic or something, about the origins of St. Nicholas. Basically he was a real tough guy who helped spread the gospel of Christianity, and would sometimes beat up mockers and blasphemous folk. He wasn't the jolly giver of gifts we know today. I'm not sure the name of the Christmas documentary this segment was included in, but it was hosted or narrated by Kirk Cameron. I'm sure it's on YouTube somewhere. I found it interesting but not sure how much of it I buy into.
I think I saw the same one
 

Robbiem

Well-Known Member
The country we now called Turkey had no Turks in it before the eleventh century. St. Nicholas was not Turkish.
St Nicholas was actually a Greek Orthodox priest in what is now Turkey. Traditionally europeans celebrated his saint day on December 6th and this is still a tradition in some places like the Netherlands and parts of Germany where he leaves candy for children, often in their shoes. In these countries on December 25th the Christ child visits good children and perform a role to santa, although some places also have ‘black peter’ an evil spirit who leaves coal for bad children (this is a whole other can of equality worms I don’t want to open here).

In Henry the Eighth’s England the idea of Father Christmas developed because St Nicholas day wasn’t celebrated after the founding of the Church of England. He was a jolly, chubby man who embodied the ‘spirit of goodwill’ he was revived in the Victorian era when the modern Christmas developed - Dickens Spirit of Christmas present is an example.

Thomas Nast in Harpers magazine in the late 19th century used these to create what we would think of as santa which then evolved with other more commercial ideas (Coke ads, greeting cards etc) to create what people now think of as Santa Claus so he really does belong to most of the western world.

interestingly there has been a long history of afro carribean santas which the article below summarises

 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom