Disney-Pixar Studios Theme Park?

fizzle75

New Member
Alien stays!!! Take out Tarzan, Fantasia (last minute replacement), and a more recent musical in place of Footlight Parade. You know what I would love to see in GMR? Some little nod to the superhero movies (superman, batman at least).

I personally think the Great Movie Ride should be all about classic movies,movies that had a huge cultural impact or movies that define their genre. I definitely think Mary Poppins and the Wizard of Oz should stay but I think excellent additions would be...

The Lord Of The Rings Trilogy
Chicago or Moulin Rouge
Titanic
The Shawsank Redemption or The Green Mile
Spiderman or X-Men
Rudy
Napoleon Dynamite(not necassarily a great movie but it's cultural impact is undeniable)
The Nightmare Before Christmas
Driving Miss Daisy

I would love to see all of these movies represented by AA scenes not simple movie clips. Forgive me if some of the movies I mentioned are already in the ride but it has been a while since I have ridden it and I have only ridden it 3 times. I think this could be one of my favorite attractions if it were updated and given a little love. I still love it now though.
 

chipanddalefan5

New Member
I love the idea of having a cartoon type land, specifically toon town. A bunch of movies can fit into that catagory, one movie in particular is rodger rabbit, this movie was based all around studios, they could be very creative with this idea. They could also squeeze in some rides that didn't make the cut in the parks originally, i'm sure marni1971 could come up with some with the list he had on another forum.
 

marni1971

Park History nut
Premium Member
:)
Toon Town Trolley, Bennie the Cab, Baby Hermans Runaway Buggy, The Great Muppet Movie Ride, D Ick Traceys Crimestoppers, Mickeys Movieland...

They have the plans. The R&D is done. They have the money. They just won`t spend it.
 

juan

Well-Known Member
If it becomes Disney-Pixar Studios, it doesn't necessarily mean that it will have Pixar rides. It could be for a subdivision of Pixar Animation relocated to the old animation buildings.
 

unkadug

Follower of "Saget"The Cult
If it becomes Disney-Pixar Studios, it doesn't necessarily mean that it will have Pixar rides. It could be for a subdivision of Pixar Animation relocated to the old animation buildings.

Wouldn't that make for a fascinating animation tour:

"Ladies and gentlemen, here you can see the difference in Bryce, Maya, Blender, TrueSpace, Lightwave, 3D Studio Max, SoftImage XSI, and Alice animation.

Moving, we are moving along... watch monotonously as this computer renders the shadows of 1/64 of a second of Pixars next release due out in 2009 !"
 

jedimaster1227

Active Member
:)
Toon Town Trolley, Bennie the Cab, Baby Hermans Runaway Buggy, The Great Muppet Movie Ride, D Ick Traceys Crimestoppers, Mickeys Movieland...

They have the plans. The R&D is done. They have the money. They just won`t spend it.

All of which have potential for greatness. I think Toy Story Mania could provide the boost in attendance that MGM needs for the next attraction to be greenlit. But then again, there were a few other ideas that you didn't list that made it pretty far into R&D too. But, I am going to stay away from those ideas before I get lynched... :zipit:

If it becomes Disney-Pixar Studios, it doesn't necessarily mean that it will have Pixar rides. It could be for a subdivision of Pixar Animation relocated to the old animation buildings.

I highly doubt that Pixar would even consider moving a portion of its company over here in Orlando for the same reason that MGM's studios were shut down along with Universal Studios' (and Nickelodeon Studios') in Florida. Florida isn't a profittable location for productions any more. Though, there is a reason that all of the attractions installed in the studio sections of MGM Studios are modular... :animwink:
 

Tom Morrow

Well-Known Member
:)
Toon Town Trolley, Bennie the Cab, Baby Hermans Runaway Buggy, The Great Muppet Movie Ride, D Ick Traceys Crimestoppers, Mickeys Movieland...

They have the plans. The R&D is done. They have the money. They just won`t spend it.
Yeah, all those ideas would be great... if this were the year 1990. Theres a reason they never used them.

Oh, and the park isn't "in shambles" just because it didn't fufil its original purpose. It is still capable of being a working studio, it just isn't profitable to film there so nobody does it. But the park is supposed to feel like a combination of fictional Hollywood and being in an actual movie studio... and it does that just fine.

Universal Studios Florida is not used as a real studio anymore either.
 

the-reason14

Well-Known Member
This is all seems to kinda be adding up. Pixar is a pretty key component in disney animation, they could and might do this because in a way it makes sense. However, I dont know, all these years of Dmgm studious being mgm, it may just seem odd with it not being that way anymore.

I dont know what to think about all of this yet, is this a rumor or a fact?
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
VERY likely to happen in the next 12-18 months.

Which is exactly what the Al Lutz Miceage article said would happen. The rebranding to Disney-Pixar Studios begins in 2008, 12 to 18 months from now.

I would imagine the opening of Toy Story Mania in May '08 will be the kickoff for this name change and rebranding job. There's a few other Florida mentions scattered amongst the Disneyland news in Mr. Lutz's latest update on that website.

It's interesting that this news first came from a Disneyland-centered website instead of a Florida-centered website.
 

Tom Morrow

Well-Known Member
This is all just rumors. I work at Disney-MGM Studios, and there is talk of Pixar setting up a studio here, but no mention of changing the park's name. The dropping of MGM from the name is one of those WDW rumors that has been around for years, much like a "Villains" park. But considering they have renewed the contract with MGM to sell merchandise with MGM's name on it, like tirian said, the MGM is not dropping from the name anytime soon.
 

Epcot82Guy

Well-Known Member
This actually could be a fine transition. It also would make more sense considering current trends (especially since the DIsney-MGM relationship was not as obvious).

I do think this is falling into the generic Disney model, though. I think this could prove a wonderful move if the parks were given more cohesive themes to their lands. I realize there are a lot of debates as to the average guests not caring, but I think they do (at least subconsciously) more than that. Adding the Pixar label could create a resurgence into the major areas of film, areas of production, or something else.

I do think that reclaiming the backlot could free up a great area for some new attractions.
 

socalkdg

Active Member
I would imagine the opening of Toy Story Mania in May '08 will be the kickoff for this name change and rebranding job. There's a few other Florida mentions scattered amongst the Disneyland news in Mr. Lutz's latest update on that website.
The theming of the outside of Toy Story Mania is supposed to look like the outside of Pixar's studio, I believe. Combined with the change in the park name and any other additional Pixar additions(maybe Block Party comes to WDW in 2008) should help kick off the name change. Who knows, maybe Monsters Inc Laugh Floor moves to the Studios as well.

What are the chances that Pirates and Narnia are added to GMR?
 

ToTBellHop

Well-Known Member
I should point out that an MGM Studios Theme Park is now under construction (or soon to begin construction) in South Korea. You can check it out here: http://www.thinkwelldesign.com/what_we_do/master_mgm.html

MGM seems ready to move on with its theme park rights. Disney getting the rights to put MGM back on its merchandise doesn't mean anything other than that they were not ready for a name-change just yet, which they aren't. Disney-Pixar Studios would make no sense right now, so they need to keep the current name for now. You might argue that they could've just gone with Disney Studios, but how ridiculous would it be to be Disney-MGM Studios, then Disney Studios for a year, then Disney-Pixar Studios? Suffice it to say, if MGM wants their own theme park opened by 2010, they are not going to want Disney to be using their name, potentially diluting the brand, by then. The changeover will come sooner rather than later.
 

STGRhost

Member
:king: I hope you all forgive my ramblings - I'm half in the bag from cough medicine, but I wanted to contribute...

I can tell you that the Disney-Pixar name is coming, heard it from a trustworthy source a while ago.

That same source also said that I should get my last rides on GMR while I can.

This comment reminded me of something:
Back when I was still in GR at the Studios (this situation was in early 2001), a coworker and very dear friend of mine (we'll call him Tom) was the tour guide for Paul Pressler. We were working on an upcoming property tour and he got called to be on tour for a couple days while Paul visited the parks. Now, I wouldn't say Tom thought he was a friend of Paul's, but he did spend a good ammount of time with him when he was on tour. And, as these tours were primarily for buisiness reasons, Tom was privy to hearing (and sometimes seeing) much more than the average hourly CM. And he told me a lot of that stuff when we worked together. At the time, I kept my mouth shut, because I knew the CM grapevine works faster than the internet to spread rumors (Many of you already know that), and also because Tom asked me to. Even when I left, and started posting more on WDWMAGIC, I didn't say anything because I still didn't (and don't) wand to get him in any trouble. However, once Pressler left, and Tom moved on in the Company, the news I started hearing from my other "connected" GR friends were that the plans Pressler had tried to put into action would not happen. So it was a non issue. Plus, it's really hard to sound like an authority when you can't name any names.

But, now and then, we hear rumors about the supposed re-branding of the studios. Some people dismiss them as completely false. I know that if I had told the story of what I knew at the time, 6 months later (give or take) I would have been "wrong", becasue those plans had changed. But they were true originally. I believe that's where all of the rumors, stories and half truths involvong the Studios come from. So many of the rumors now sound like the plans back then, with tweaks here and there.

Anyway, the plans I was told at the time involved the HAT. The story was that the reason they wanted the hat to obscure the view of the Chinese Theatre was so they could use it, and not the Theatre or Earful Tower, as the Park's Icon. Now, that part of the Hat story is fairly common knowledge, but the next few phases of this project involved MUCH more then that. They were going to take down the Chinese Theatre and add a new attraction (or a few - I don't remember exactly)in that area, The whole park was to be rebranded - it would be the first time that a Disney theme park was not only renamed (a la EuroDisneyland) but rethemed as well. The new them was going to be along the lines of "entertainment", and the different areas of the park would represent different forms of entertainment. They would have movies (of course), tv, music, radio?, Stage shows...you get the idea. Tom said a lot of the areas and changes were pretty fleshed out (he wasn't comfortable telling me EVERYTHING, unfortunately), and he even got to see a few early pieces of artwork. He tried to describe what he saw in the area formerly taken up by the Theatre, but he didn't have a lot to go on. There was some type of ferris wheel attraction (I have NO idea what that would function as) and a smaller building (either a theatre or a dark ride?). Some of the other themeing would remain, like Hollwood blvd and sunset, but some was to be changed to incorporate a theatre district, etc. All but one sound stage would be replaced by other attractions, and the backlot would go away, too. (this was all before LMA, of course). There was even talk of expanding the Theme park, and pushing the Production area across the street (Buena Vista?)

Obviously, little of these plans ever panned out. The way Tom talked, it sounded like Paul was very excited about all of the changes that were coming, and he was convinced that it was going to help tie the park together and make it make sense again. But, when tourism dropped after Sept. 11th, most of the plans were postpohned or canned. Which is a shame, beacue even though there will always be a place in my heart for "My Park", I think it really needs a lot of help. And I think these changes, if they had happened, would have gone a long way towards solving some of the Studios' problems.
 

OmegaKnight

New Member
The movies used in GMR are licensed independently of the rest of the park. Regardless of what name the park has in the future, Disney will continue to have the rights to use the movies currently seen in GMR.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom