John C. Shepherd
Active Member
it is sad people do that, but again what are they to do. I am sure disney goes YEAH we sold out, made our profit. Pushing and shoving it unreal also, I am with that one guy someone shoves my kid it will get ugly.
Sorry, but something is "worth" what someone else will pay for it.
And I'm sorry you can't see the difference between profiteering on essentials and entrepreneurship selling worthless trinkets. If you had been in South Florida or South Texas a few weeks ago, perhaps the difference would become clearer to you.
Not "sour grapes". Just stating the fact that it's hypocritical for people to complain about Disney prices in the parks but then say it's totally fine for people to mooch off Disney's name or Nintendo's or whomever else.Ever buy grapes at the local grocery store? If it weren't for all the middlemen, distributors, and warehouses out there, you'd be unable to do that. And trust me, they're not doing it for free. Everybody gets a mark-up.
What's happening with the "limited edition" merch is just another aspect of a middleman buying from the producer and reselling to the demanding consumer. It's the free-market, American capitalist way.
And speaking of grapes, I'm starting to detect a big bunch of sour grapes in your posts.
Are you saying that someday I might walk into a museum of artifacts of famous people and I will once again be reunited with my bowling patch for 4th place as a 10 year old?If it makes you feel better just imagine some kid that could keep the ball out of the gutter if he life depended on it saw the patch and now thanks to that patch he gained the confidence he needed to bowl 300.... Or you could just be realist and accept that it was probably tossed into a box of random junk that someone bought as a lot and then tossed the patch when they went through the box... The beauty of it being sold is you can now imagine any story you want for what happened to it... if you had it where would it really be, probably in a box in a closet collecting dust.
You mean like selling a 500 dollar harbor freight generator for 2500... Some would call this an 'efficient allocation of resources signalling demand elasticity'. Others call it profiteering.
Yes the guy who buys a truckload of gensets and hauls them to a disaster site needs to get a significant premium over MSRP but not 5x MSRP
Wait, wait... I think I've got it. The generator was a necessity and people needed it to survive and toys are not necessary and therefore if anyone is foolish enough to spend that much money on that junk, well, frankly it's hard to care.I’m sure if you think a moment, you can explain why that’s different than Disney toys.
Wait, wait... I think I've got it. The generator was a necessity and people needed it to survive and toys are not necessary and therefore if anyone is foolish enough to spend that much money on that junk, well, frankly it's hard to care.
Was I close? I just wanted to help the exploder grasp the difference. Hope I was a help!
And if I was... what do I win?
I use the word junk as a loose term to denote things of no real value other then mental candy.Close enough!
Although I tend to stay away from the “that junk“ argument because one man’s trash is another man’s treasure. Suffice it to say it’s not a necessity.
Sure... and if you really believe that I've got a great deal on a bridge in New York City you might want to consider purchasing.Are you saying that someday I might walk into a museum of artifacts of famous people and I will once again be reunited with my bowling patch for 4th place as a 10 year old?
Well, as we all know...Sure... and if you really believe that I've got a great deal on a bridge in New York City you might want to consider purchasing.
Sure, build up my dreams and then shatter them to tiny little pieces. I need to go lie down.Sure... and if you really believe that I've got a great deal on a bridge in New York City you might want to consider purchasing.
But is profiteering in this case illegal? Unlikely. If the people to whom the generators were being offered at $2,500 did not have that amount of money or chose not to spend that amount of money, the price of the generators would start dropping unless the seller is content to sit on the inventory until his price is met. Conversely, a wealthy individual could offer $10,000 for that same generator. Again, an item's value is only what someone else is willing to pay for it or what the seller is willing to accept.You mean like selling a 500 dollar harbor freight generator for 2500... Some would call this an 'efficient allocation of resources signalling demand elasticity'. Others call it profiteering.
Yes the guy who buys a truckload of gensets and hauls them to a disaster site needs to get a significant premium over MSRP but not 5x MSRP
Well, as we all know...
But is profiteering in this case illegal? Unlikely. If the people to whom the generators were being offered at $2,500 did not have that amount of money or chose not to spend that amount of money, the price of the generators would start dropping unless the seller is content to sit on the inventory until his price is met. Conversely, a wealthy individual could offer $10,000 for that same generator. Again, an item's value is only what someone else is willing to pay for it or what the seller is willing to accept.
As for a "significant" premium, who gets to decide what's acceptable on the secondary market? Is 4X acceptable, but not 5x? Not everyone has the same moral compass to help people in a disaster.
...but I still hate them at Christmastime.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.