Epcotfan21
Well-Known Member
I've lost count to be honest. I still think it's April 2020.3rd. Not 4th.
You’re still in your 2nd.
I've lost count to be honest. I still think it's April 2020.3rd. Not 4th.
You’re still in your 2nd.
They can exempt children too young for a vaccine from the requirement, just as they now exempt children too young to wear masks from the mask requirement. People forget that WDW has been letting in children without masks since the day they reopened - not because very young children can't contract or spread COVID but because masks were deemed unsafe for them.The challenge of this is that there are lots of children who go to Disney World and they will not even be eligible for vaccinations for quite a while.
Not really, there were plenty of places where this was doable in Feb, especially where the photopass photographers are.The hard part is finding a place where you can be socially distant.
I agree with that, let's keep social distancing to a point. 6 feet might be excessive, but 3 feet is reasonable. It would always help guests with certain disabilities as well.Indeed. You will need to remain distanced of course. Which I’m fine with. I hate strangers being close to me, especially when I’m drinking or have a Dole Whip. I’d be happy if strangers permanently stayed 3 feet away from me. Yuck.
I'd settle for people not walking five abreast and stopping suddenly in the middle of the walkway.I agree with that, let's keep social distancing to a point. 6 feet might be excessive, but 3 feet is reasonable. It would always help guests with certain disabilities as well.
If they don’t sell a “Harmonious Taco Flight” of four street tacos surrounding a circular dish of guacamole and pico at La Cantina de San Angel, they’re missing a golden opportunity.Uni Announced VelociCoaster opens June 10th.
WDW announces Relaxed masks date and the 4th Taco barge comes out.
I don't think that they do, realistically, such a requirement would cause far more problems in trying to implement. Additionally, if they were to require vaccine passports, under federal they could legally be held liable for all damages a person incurs from any side effects from the vaccines since this vaccine is only approved for emergency use. This isn't something Disney would want to open themselves up to.well actually... here's my theory
I think disney wants vaccine passports.....They just can't come out and say that right now.
This new mask thing will cause issues, they know that. God bless those CMS.
The CM unions may fight for it.
This change may give Disney grounds to require it.
Down the line this could present them with the opportunity to say "hey you know what, its getting hard to control this, to make it easy and safe for our CMS and guests, we are now going to require that everyone is vaccinated.No more masks, just vaccinations."
I think they want proof of vaccines.
Yeah, I will go with that as well.I'd settle for people not walking five abreast and stopping suddenly in the middle of the walkway.
This is not true. Thats all I'm gonna say about it.Additionally, if they were to require vaccine passports, under federal they could legally be held liable for all damages a person incurs from any side effects from the vaccines since this vaccine is only approved for emergency use.
When we went to Dollywood and Silver Dollar City last summer they had the same rule and everyone followed the rules quite well overall. Yes, there are a few that didn't, but not that many.Unless it leads to guests always claiming they're about to take a photo. Seems like more gray area for cast members to police. I think the change makes sense, but I don't envy any cast member dealing with the inevitable loophole finders.
Actually, it is indeed true that they could open themselves up to liability, there are various sites that have the information about it. But, the letter of the law does seem to read that any private company that requires a vaccine that only has emergency authorization can be held legally liable for the damages a person suffers from the vaccine. There is absolutely no doubt that this applies to employees, basically if a company requires you to get the COVID vaccine (or any treatment that only has emergency authorization and not full approval) to continue working there, they are liable for all damages. The slightly gray area is does this also apply if a company requires a customer to get the vaccine in order to continue being a customer, are they liable? This is why I said they could be opening themselves up to liability and didn't say the definitely would. It isn't something that a court case has been decided on with it yet, but there are some currently in the works.This is not true. Thats all I'm gonna say about it.
Honestly, I said the fastest way to increase photopass sales was to allow people to take masks off only when using photopass photographers and only at their direction. They just went a step further than that and allowed it for all outdoor photos if socially distanced.I have a feeling this is what's behind it. That and they don't want their CM's to have to yell at people for taking off their masks for a second to snap a photo.
The letter of what law?Actually, it is indeed true that they could open themselves up to liability, there are various sites that have the information about it. But, the letter of the law does seem to read that any private company that requires a vaccine that only has emergency authorization can be held legally liable for the damages a person suffers from the vaccine. There is absolutely no doubt that this applies to employees, basically if a company requires you to get the COVID vaccine (or any treatment that only has emergency authorization and not full approval) to continue working there, they are liable for all damages. The slightly gray area is does this also apply if a company requires a customer to get the vaccine in order to continue being a customer, are they liable? This is why I said they could be opening themselves up to liability and didn't say the definitely would. It isn't something that a court case has been decided on with it yet, but there are some currently in the works.
This isn't something that has been explicitly written, as no one would ever have thought that companies would try to require their customers to show proof of vaccines, especially ones with emergency authorization. So, it will be interesting to see what side the courts come in on this in the end, but the point is valid that they could be in for a world of hurt if they try and I just don't see Disney opening themselves up to that mess.
Not really, there were plenty of places where this was doable in Feb, especially where the photopass photographers are.
They are calling it the 4th.3rd. Not 4th.
You’re still in your 2nd.
for what it's worth, an article over the weekend in the Wall Street Journal by Nicole Saphier, who is a doctor at Memorial Sloan Kettering and a professor at Weill Cornell Medical College says "if the coronavirus epidemic in the US continues on it's current trajectory, the need for masks outside particular local outbreak areas will pass in a matter of weeks" and that herd immunity is likely to be reached by Memorial Day weekend at the latest.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.