Wow. . . . It's amazing how tolerant and understanding we are until we encounter something we can't tolerate
.
There is absolutely NO WAY WDW is going to get into the muddy waters of trying to determine whose is actually "disabled" and who is not. What about someone who just gets tired easily? What about the guest who is in perfect shape, but has been nursing the hugest blisters on his or her feet because of all the walking they've been doing? What about the person who is in great shape but might come to WDW with a sore knee or shin splints? These are people who wouldn't have a handicapped license plate or a permanent ID, but may, on any given day, need a ECV. These are just a few examples of the MANY that pop up for a guest who does the amount of walking in the HOT HUMID weather of Orlando on an average WDW trip. Each person has a different story, and we may think some are more legit than others, but it would be stupid of Disney to start trying to come up with a policy to judge who does and does not have a "real" reason for using an ECV.
In the past, these people would have to stay in their hotel rooms or didn't even bother to come to Disney World. Those who can't put up with the ECV's might be thinking, "good! keep all those people out of the parks so that my day isn't ruined by the crazy carts!" But that, it seems to me, is NOT what Disney World is all about (speaking of what Disney is all about. . . those people staying away also represent a serious loss of revenue for Disney).
The biggest complaint I have about the ECV's is that they are big. They take up a lot of space and aren't maneuverable when there are large crowds. The other thing is that people tend not to see the rider, who is below eye level, until they are right in front of him or her. The rider can't see anything except the rear ends and backs of the people in front of him or her. There are a lot of adults and kids who dart in front of and around the cart and endanger themselves and their children in the process. There are also a lot of riders who don't know how to "drive" in a crowd (or out in the open for that matter). I would think that the stand-up ones would at least help with this situation. It would make them less cumbersome and help with visibility. Replacing a bunch of the "sidewalk yachts" with a scooter that has a much smaller footprint would go a long way toward reducing some of the problems that arise from the ECV use.
I don't like it when people abuse the system, but my guess is that people DON'T abuse the ECV's as often we might think. They are not particularly fun to use. There is not really a benefit to having them unless you can't function in the parks without them. If you're going to go to Disney World, you should know that having one of those things is a logistical pain unless you really need it. If you don't know this, you will quickly learn. Disney is wise to just offer them for rent and leave it at that. They are also wise to now offer vehicles with a smaller "footprint" and easier line of sight for the rider.
At the risk of sounding preachy, I'd say that as a regular walking guest, you should also be able to put up with them. Recognize that while they can be a nuisance, they are part of the deal. It's like saying they should do away with strollers. It's not going to happen, so spending time trying to wish it would is crazy. Besides, even if we are blessed with good health, we are all just twisted ankle away from needing one. In a relatively small number of years, simply because of age, even those of us who are injury free may need one just to keep from over-exerting ourselves and needing another cumbersome and disruptive vehicle at WDW--the ambulance.
Thank goodness they exist--otherwise we'd be stuck at home.