According to the site that shall not be named, Disney has purchased 235 acres of land adjacent to the western side of the property. While I would not normally care the number of acres got me suspicious.
Due to the location of the purchased property, I would suspect the land to be used for absolutely nothing, but that is where I became suspicious.
Land in all areas have development restrictions, Disney is no exception, despite the fact they literary own the local government.
Both HS and AK have a footprint of roughly 300 acres including the parking area.
Theoretically, over the long term could the land be used as a transfer of development restrictions to free up land in a better location?
I am not saying tomorrow, next year, or the year after, but could it be a sign of some mass development in the works?
Due to the location of the purchased property, I would suspect the land to be used for absolutely nothing, but that is where I became suspicious.
Land in all areas have development restrictions, Disney is no exception, despite the fact they literary own the local government.
Both HS and AK have a footprint of roughly 300 acres including the parking area.
Theoretically, over the long term could the land be used as a transfer of development restrictions to free up land in a better location?
I am not saying tomorrow, next year, or the year after, but could it be a sign of some mass development in the works?