Censorship is Propaganda
I will admit, that companies have every right to make choices about their buisness. With that in mind, would you then agree that companies are looking out for the best interest of their consumers or merely trying to make a quick buck. I would cite such companies as Enron and WorldCom who are empire (not unlike Disney) and are companies the American citizen are now paying for.
I would not say that Mr. Moore has "lied" and, yes, his movies are liberal propaganda, but that you must also concede that his practices in a movie are not nearly as effective and far reaching as those of FOX and Disney (and the Disney-owned ABC and all of its subsidiaries).
Moreover, Noam Chomsky has said that the government and corporations often collaborate to control the public mind through propaganda. I am certain that if they are being mentioned in international State Department or National Security briefings they must be in cahoots.
You also say: "that liberal propaganda... sheds a negative light on the current administration and the war during an election year by a person who has a documented history of lying and distorting the truth for personal gain." It seems that some gain, be it personal or corporate, is trying to be made by Disney and its conservative sharholders as you have so brightly pointed out are among the conservative majority of the US. Mr Eisner writes: In the case of "Fahrenheit 9/11," we chose a path that was right for the company and its stakeholders." It seems pretty obvious. He also drops the Fifth Ammendment in the article. It has to do with freedom. A friend of mine who works for Disney has told me he does not have the freedom to let his facial hair grow or his hair to be anything other than perfect.
Oh yeah, there is a small percentage of people who actually vote in this country. the majority of whom are vetted by large corporations. Those corporations looking out for their interests are not any longer "patriots" like your 'boy' Walt. They are devious, corrupt and stand for values that oppose those their very cute characters are supposed to support.
Finally, you must understand that without transparency democracy fails. Therefore, people with compelling ideas and perspectives about government, Disney, education, social security or any other social issues ought to share them. It is then the responsibility of the voting masses to come to a well-informed conclusion based upon the wealth of evidence out there be it conservative, liberal, etc.
You are clearly a staunch conservative who will only perpetuate his beliefs, like the stockholders and executives down in Orlando, until the American population is made up robots buying their tickets to Florida, California, Paris, that new island park or everwhere else that the infectious Disney Corp. has been spread.
I will admit, that companies have every right to make choices about their buisness. With that in mind, would you then agree that companies are looking out for the best interest of their consumers or merely trying to make a quick buck. I would cite such companies as Enron and WorldCom who are empire (not unlike Disney) and are companies the American citizen are now paying for.
I would not say that Mr. Moore has "lied" and, yes, his movies are liberal propaganda, but that you must also concede that his practices in a movie are not nearly as effective and far reaching as those of FOX and Disney (and the Disney-owned ABC and all of its subsidiaries).
Moreover, Noam Chomsky has said that the government and corporations often collaborate to control the public mind through propaganda. I am certain that if they are being mentioned in international State Department or National Security briefings they must be in cahoots.
You also say: "that liberal propaganda... sheds a negative light on the current administration and the war during an election year by a person who has a documented history of lying and distorting the truth for personal gain." It seems that some gain, be it personal or corporate, is trying to be made by Disney and its conservative sharholders as you have so brightly pointed out are among the conservative majority of the US. Mr Eisner writes: In the case of "Fahrenheit 9/11," we chose a path that was right for the company and its stakeholders." It seems pretty obvious. He also drops the Fifth Ammendment in the article. It has to do with freedom. A friend of mine who works for Disney has told me he does not have the freedom to let his facial hair grow or his hair to be anything other than perfect.
Oh yeah, there is a small percentage of people who actually vote in this country. the majority of whom are vetted by large corporations. Those corporations looking out for their interests are not any longer "patriots" like your 'boy' Walt. They are devious, corrupt and stand for values that oppose those their very cute characters are supposed to support.
Finally, you must understand that without transparency democracy fails. Therefore, people with compelling ideas and perspectives about government, Disney, education, social security or any other social issues ought to share them. It is then the responsibility of the voting masses to come to a well-informed conclusion based upon the wealth of evidence out there be it conservative, liberal, etc.
You are clearly a staunch conservative who will only perpetuate his beliefs, like the stockholders and executives down in Orlando, until the American population is made up robots buying their tickets to Florida, California, Paris, that new island park or everwhere else that the infectious Disney Corp. has been spread.
