DznyGrlSD
Well-Known Member
- In the Parks
- Yes
Does anyone have pictures of the shooting gallery?? I would really love to see it!
Google is awesome
Does anyone have pictures of the shooting gallery?? I would really love to see it!
I was hoping to start a serious thread on this but many have already taken the bait of the easy angles...
First lets understand this is Disney reacting to a law written to combat nothing related at all to redemption arcades. In the ever ongoing game of cat and mouse between gambling setups and the states, FL passed an overly broad law that in effect puts classic redemption arcades in the cross hairs.
The real target was gaming setups aimed at exploiting seniors - hence the "Internet cafe" references.
Constraints added like requiring the games be coin operated and the value limits make the classic business model illegal and put people like Disney, chuck e cheese, Dave n busters etc in the bullseye.
Similar misguided laws have been a problem in this area as well... Where efforts to control grey-area gambling setups designed to skirt existing laws lead to the states passing stupid laws that impact arcades. In Maryland, the law tried to move the redemption games under the lottery commission and basically regulate them like slot machines with all the extra costs and restrictions that brought.
What I find crazy in this story is that a lobby entity for the arcade and bingo operators is the one filing lawsuits against the arcade operators!
The seniors places all got targeted to be shutdown... Yet the big names did not... So they are suing so that d&b and Cec get shutdown as well in a strategy to try to draw companies with more resources into the fight against the law.
Disney's action is simply there same song of risk advErsion. Rather than risk being drawn into the fight they just remove the redemption. But like most places, redemption is the majority of the arcade space and business... So will Disney abandon their arcades all together?
OMG you rock! I have so many guests telling me about this! I finally get to see it! THank you!!!!Google is awesome
Google is awesome
Google is awesome
Flynnibus you are correct. The whole reason this mess started was when the Seminole Indian tribe file a lawsuit against these "Senior Arcades" since it was pure online gambling saying they were illegal since they have a charter with Tallahassee which gives them exclusive rights to gambling in Florida. The attorneys for these "Senior Arcades" dragged in redemption arcades to help get the focus of attention off of them. That's when they looked into the Florida statues 849.161. This statute is very vague and does not fully identify what type of games that are in a redemption arcade. They lump them altogether as gambling machines. So the attorney Mike Wolf who represents the "Arcade and Bingo Association" does not represent redemption arcades like cec, d&b, disney or any other redemption arcades be it a local chain or a mom and pop operation. Disney was fighting this but instead decided that protecting the brand's image to be the top priority. If the individuals that don't like arcades or consider them "gambling for kids" are not getting the point. At the bottom of the Sentinel story they should have seen where an investigator was sent in to see if Disney's arcades where violating the law. The investigator said that they are not violating the gaming law. Some of the games we have here are app games that more than likely these individuals have on the phones or tablets. Apparently I didn't realize Fruit Ninja, Doodle Jump and Cut the Rope were gambling games.
Yes Disney is removing the redemption games because of this statute and the failure of the bills in the Senate and House that defined the difference between gambling machines and redemption/amusement machines.
As for the claw games, if people did their homework, NJ has a law on the books that states claw games are to be play till you win games. As jbolen2 stated his cranes are also set for play till you win. There is this law called gravity that interferes with things being picked up. So you have to keep trying until the crane has a good grip on the right part of the toy in question. Which requires skill.
If all these redemption games are so "evil" as people say then why do so many guests play in our arcades? If they were a blight to Disney, the guests wouldn't play in the arcades and Disney wouldn't have them in the first place. No matter how the guest does on the game they still win a ticket or tickets. Over the years I've seen kids grow up that play in the arcades and they have not turned into gamblers... They play to have fun, if they win tickets in the process that great, if they don't that's great too.
Gaming machines like video poker, blackjack, slots etc...they are designed to give the house the advantage. They don't want you be big winners they just want you to lose lots of your money in these machines...and maybe give a small win depending on the programming of the computers which includes a random number generator.
The other big picture that no one seems to see is the loss of thousands of jobs from the coin-op industry because of all this. This not only includes the employees and owners, but also the technicians that repair the games among others. Why should we be punished because of ignorant politicians and lawyers?
\Re: payouts. You are making statements based on observations... I'm making statements from knowledge of actual operators who own the games.
Great info. Would make for a great chat over a beer, not necessarily in a casino or resort. D) Thanks.
The live-controlled Billy Bob figure interests me the most because it's an area where Disney lagged behind considerably.
In fact, I'm not aware of any live-controlled figures in the parks currently, and certainly none that talk. Perhaps it's because Disney has a strong policy against multiple actors attempting recognizable voices. The only examples of this I'm aware of are Crush and Stitch, and both of those use screen-based, rather than physical figures.
The living character initiative never really lead to any meaningful outcome.
Unless we count "Push", which is arguably not even an animatronic, the only one I've ever seen is this animatronic Buzzard at Dollywood, though every time I've seen him it's been set to an automatic show mode.
I'm not sure if they ever attempt manual control these days.
Disclosure... I like casinos, gambling, and all the things vegas is associated with...
Just another example of the Disney greed.
Can you help explain to me how this is an example of Disney greed?
I'm pretty sure that was a joke. You know how some people respond to ever decision to that Disney makes with that line?
Roz, out at DCA*s *Monsters Inc.* themed dark ride, is a animatronic figure that is performed live by one of her *friends* behind the scenes.
She is the last figure you see before unloading, and her comments can be very specific about the Guests she sees approach in the ride vehicles.
Regarding the LCI , what we have seen so far is just the tip of the creative iceberg.
ReasonsCan you help explain to me how this is an example of Disney greed?
That remains to be seen.
Between Push and Lucky the Dinosaur, we've lost more interactive figures that we've gained.
I totally agree, but I wonder what the prototypes that we have seen are leading up to. Each Living Initiative Project seemed to beget another yet what is the final outcome?Think of them as *research projects* for bigger ideas to come.
You have to thoroughly test out a concept first in the proper setting and situation before moving forward in the direction of bigger and better things.
Robotic guest.I totally agree, but I wonder what the prototypes that we have seen are leading up to. Each Living Initiative Project seemed to beget another yet what is the final outcome?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.