danlb_2000
Premium Member
A patent doesn’t mean it should be expected anywhere.
I looked through the threads that have been started here over the years about new ride system patents and I have yet to find one that became reality.
A patent doesn’t mean it should be expected anywhere.
I looked through the threads that have been started here over the years about new ride system patents and I have yet to find one that became reality.
To be fair, I believe the current thread only goes back like five years - which is about how long it takes to build something, even after we know about it coming. I'm pretty sure we saw patent filings for things like SDMT, for example.
4- the proposed patent does not show a separate loading for disabled guests. This will really limit capacity in California and Florida.
That space is labeled “MAINTENANCE BAY A” but a patent application is not a building permit application. There is no need to show or even yet know any of that sort of detail unless it is important to what is being patented. There is little reason to assume the ride layout is anything more than a diagram for the purpose of illustrating the patent.The particular image of the track layout seems cropped slightly. If you look in the right-hand corners there are switches before and after the Load/Unload platform that lead off the edge of the pic. That would most likely be handicap load/unload. (Which means that do get to the regular load/unload would require guests to ho down and back up, rather than the usual up-over-and-down.
-Rob
Everyone knows they're building a CA coaster at DCA, could this be it?
Martin said at a the Disneyland Forum that he has heard of something...
I know, I read the thread, but if you read Martin’s answer he said “This system so far as I know is not for a jungle book ride”, therefore he must know of a plan/ride that involves this patent. Otherwise, he would have stated that a simple no or that there aren’t any plansThat quote attributed to Martin earlier in this thread is not him. The screen name said Marni71, and his is Marni1971. Also, it wouldn't allow linking back to the original post. I think it was edited to make it look like Martin posted it.
My opinion is why would they patent a system they can't use? Maybe they think of systems Uni would use for their IPs and patent them. Also an Incredibles ride would be incredible.
Huge difference between Disney, a billion dollar theme park, and a traveling half assed built state fair ride.Long swing-arm rides will be getting extra scrutiny after what happened at the Ohio State Fair. Here's hoping they engineer in some extra corrosion control and access to inspect the interior of those arms...
Really?Huge difference between Disney, a billion dollar theme park, and a traveling half assed built state fair ride.
The ride was not built in some shack and passed the same sort of inspections that even Disney would have been required to perform.Huge difference between Disney, a billion dollar theme park, and a traveling half assed built state fair ride.
Huge difference between Disney, a billion dollar theme park, and a traveling half assed built state fair ride.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.